I'd say it's close to the nikon:just a small correction: Sigma 120 -300 / 2.8 Sports is not as sharp as Canikon 300/2.8 primes. not even close.
What's better, making something so successful that you can't produce enough to satisfy demand or having to dump at massive discounts after a year?Lol, you are right. It is still listed on BH as "New - Limited quantity" for a two year old lens.
Yeah, Nuh . At 300mm end Sigma is a descent but not a spectacular lens. Very good AF by the way. But, shhhh. Do not tell Sigma that they sell this lens way to cheapI'd say it's close to the nikon:
View the image quality delivered by the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sports Lens using ISO 12233 Resolution Chart lab test results. Compare the image quality of this lens with other lenses.www.the-digital-picture.com