The article is actually not filed under old... it's just that the title starts with, "Old is gold..." and the URL contains the title
Title aside, the original 6D is a fantastic camera. The only thing is, the 6D Mark II is better in every way, and I'd certainly encourage anyone who's considering a thousand bucks for a 6D to think about a little bit more for a Mark II.
The article is actually not filed under old... it's just that the title starts with, "Old is gold..." and the URL contains the title
Title aside, the original 6D is a fantastic camera. The only thing is, the 6D Mark II is better in every way, and I'd certainly encourage anyone who's considering a thousand bucks for a 6D to think about a little bit more for a Mark II.
I agree, Talys. I have both cameras. Over the holidays, in the U.S., you could get the 6D ii for just $300 more ($1299 compared to $999) and they were throwing in a Canon battery grip (and some other things) with the 6D ii. To me, the battery grip is a must-have. I bet they will have that deal again (if they currently do not).