jolyonralph said:But I suspect the very best we would hope for in a standard pro zoom would be f/4 constant. But more likely f/3.5-5.6
I suspect hoping for any sort of standard pro zoom EF-M lens is a pipe dream.
Upvote
0
jolyonralph said:But I suspect the very best we would hope for in a standard pro zoom would be f/4 constant. But more likely f/3.5-5.6
neuroanatomist said:I suspect hoping for any sort of standard pro zoom EF-M lens is a pipe dream.
jolyonralph said:neuroanatomist said:I suspect hoping for any sort of standard pro zoom EF-M lens is a pipe dream.
Well, yes, the chances of getting an EF-M 'L' lens are close to zero. What I should have said was "higher-quality" than the baseline low-end zooms we have now.
exquisitor said:eosuser1234 said:I think the quality and specs these lens and the quality of the new flash will be a key sign for what the FF mirrorless from Canon will look like. If it is a near PRO quality product with EF-M mount, than I would read that the FF mirrorless could possibly be a EF-M mount. Same goes for the mirrorless flash. If it is some 90 or 200 series, I would not read much into it, but if it is a quality 300-600series mirrorless flash, I could see it being aimed at FF mirrorless with hotshoe but no built in flash.
If FF mirrorless from Canon coming anytime soon... Besides the new lens would be probably for APS-C only, so no relevance for FF. And there are excellent flashes from Canon out there. Why not use them with EOS M now? What this "mirrorless" flash should mean?
Wizardly said:Oh please, oh please be a 26mm f/2 IS STM or a 15mm f/2.4 STM!
schmidtfilme said:Wizardly said:Oh please, oh please be a 26mm f/2 IS STM or a 15mm f/2.4 STM!
Why? There is already a 22 f2 which I own and which is really great. What would a 26 f2 deliver?
CincyTriGuy said:I have a 1Dx Mark II and a G7x. I recently went on vacation and I wanted something in between those to take with me. I figured since I already have an EF-M 18-55 I might as well just get the M6 body only and slap the 18-55 on it.
AvTvM said:only lens really missing in EF-M lineup today is a compact, moderately fast short tele-prime.
EF-M 85/2.4 IS STM ... with IQ like the EF-M 22/2.0 and size like EF-M 18-55 ... here we come! 8)
okaro said:AvTvM said:only lens really missing in EF-M lineup today is a compact, moderately fast short tele-prime.
EF-M 85/2.4 IS STM ... with IQ like the EF-M 22/2.0 and size like EF-M 18-55 ... here we come! 8)
But would such a lens be any smaller than the EF one?
okaro said:AvTvM said:only lens really missing in EF-M lineup today is a compact, moderately fast short tele-prime.
EF-M 85/2.4 IS STM ... with IQ like the EF-M 22/2.0 and size like EF-M 18-55 ... here we come! 8)
But would such a lens be any smaller than the EF one?
okaro said:AvTvM said:only lens really missing in EF-M lineup today is a compact, moderately fast short tele-prime.
EF-M 85/2.4 IS STM ... with IQ like the EF-M 22/2.0 and size like EF-M 18-55 ... here we come! 8)
But would such a lens be any smaller than the EF one?
Why? For about half a stop only in the wide side of the zoom?woodman411 said:Maybe it's the EFM version of the G1X Mark III's 15-45 f/2.8-5.6, which hopefully replaces the existing efm 15-45 f/3.5-5.6.
tron said:Why? For about half a stop only in the wide side of the zoom?woodman411 said:Maybe it's the EFM version of the G1X Mark III's 15-45 f/2.8-5.6, which hopefully replaces the existing efm 15-45 f/3.5-5.6.
slclick said:Please for the love of all things sacred, no more slow zooms.
LSXPhotog said:For the LOVE of all that is holy, please make a fast zoom or prime. I would prefer a fast zoom to replace the 15-45 I have. It's a good lens for what I use it for, but having more light gathering ability and increased size isn't entirely a bad thing - look at the Fuji 18-55mm f/2.8-4 for APS-C, it's not too large and bulky.
BillB said:Well, some of us think so. Likely, somewhat smaller than the EF 85mm 1.8. Certainly, a lot smaller and lighter than the new 85mm f1.4 IS, if it ever sees the light of day.
AvTvM said:misleading image A ... adapted 50/1.8 STM is no suitable comparison.
also beats me, why camerasize.com does not include EF 85/1.8 or 100/2.0 ... but - very compact for a FF lens - EF 85/1.8 lens is physically about 50% longer than EF 50/1.4.