The argument about the need for IBIS is something like everyone in the neighborhood has it, so do I ...
Perhaps there is not enough reason/evidence to convince Canon that IBIS is needed and/or is useful.
For still photo:
- For long focal lengths in lens IS is more effective than IBIS. It is already well documented and understood.
- For short focal lengths we have heard so far that IS is not needed anyway and that is why short focal lenght lenses usually do not have IS. Are there substantial use-cases of need/usefulness of IBIS for short focal lengths?
For video:
- We have heard that IBIS is effective, but that is not the only technology available. Panasonic has digital IS in GH5s and Canon has digital stabilization technology in EOS-R and there is some evidence that it works fine. REF: ProAV TV's, Canon EOS R - Hands on Q & A (
)