Patent: Canon RF 135mm f/1.4L USM

Canon Rumors Guy

EOS 1D MK II
Jul 20, 2010
7,977
772
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Well here’s a fun optical formula from Canon discovered by Canon News, a Canon RF 135mm f/1.4L USM.  The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM is an all-time classic, and this would certainly be an amazing offering worth of the new lens mount.
I think there is a higher than normal probability that such a lens design will make it into a consumer product.
Canon RF  135mm f/1.4L USM:

Focal length: 131.00mm
F-Number: 1.41
Half angle of view: 9.38°
Image height: 21.64mm
Total lens length:  182.28mm
BF: 13.87mm
Continue reading...
 
Last edited:

Besisika

How can you stand out, if you do like evrybdy else
Mar 25, 2014
643
31
Montreal
Be still my beating heart! If this comes to fruition I will be one very happy guy! Please Canon. Please! A native f/2 would be fine, f/1.4 would be sublime.
That would peak the chatter high. With eye focus on the EOS-R lineup, I would shoot 135 at 1.4 more often than needed. The image will be one of a kind. RF lenses seem to be smaller than the EF anyway.
 

CanonFanBoy

Really O.K. Boomer
Jan 28, 2015
4,702
2,622
Irving, Texas
That would peak the chatter high. With eye focus on the EOS-R lineup, I would shoot 135 at 1.4 more often than needed. The image will be one of a kind. RF lenses seem to be smaller than the EF anyway.
I don't know which RF lenses you are talking about being smaller (70-200?), but every RF lens I have is a monster compared to EF. However, I like that. ;)
 

jdavidse

EOS T7i
Sep 13, 2012
71
60
The difference between this lens and a 1.8 or 2.0 will be $5,000 and triple the weight. Assuming we only get 1 L lens at this focal length, I would be happy to see this lens never get made, because I would really like a compact and fast 135 L lens
 

Romain

Click by chance, everyday...
Dec 20, 2016
23
23
Lens length: 2km Lens hood: 1km Total length: 3km Weight: an elephant!.. Price: 4500$... lol ... Even with this specs it will be an instant buy! (after 10 years of savings haha...) I hope this dream lens will come true! :love:
 

StoicalEtcher

EOS RP
Jan 3, 2018
257
161
Yorkshire
Hmmn, I expect this would be an amazing lens - and probably render some amazing shots.

However..... what I like about the existing (EF)135/2 is that it is also a pretty unobtrusive little tool, which gives great results but doesn't draw any attention at all. I can't help feeling that at 135/1.4, it will be a different kettle of fish - "great", but you won't be going around subtly with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jd7

privatebydesign

Would you take advice from a cartoons stuffed toy?
Jan 29, 2011
8,243
1,599
120
The difference between this lens and a 1.8 or 2.0 will be $5,000 and triple the weight. Assuming we only get 1 L lens at this focal length, I would be happy to see this lens never get made, because I would really like a compact and fast 135 L lens
I disagree, a 135mm f1.4 need only have a 95mm front element, it’s not crazy like the larger than 100mm front elements on all the big whites. A 135mm f1.8 need only have a 75mm front element, or a 77mm filter thread.

Indeed the RF 28-70mm f2 has a 95mm front thread and is $3,000, I’d expect a 135mm f1.4 to be mechanically simpler, a similar size, lighter, and less costly. I’d guesstimate the $2,499 prince point. A 135mm f1.8 should be considerably cheaper than that, probably sub $2,000.
 

privatebydesign

Would you take advice from a cartoons stuffed toy?
Jan 29, 2011
8,243
1,599
120
This plus a sports worthy R-series body would likely be enough to bring me back to Canon. I would fully expect this lens to be in the $6-8K range though.
Why? That doesn’t make any sense or correlate with similar sized glass Canon already make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FramerMCB

CanonFanBoy

Really O.K. Boomer
Jan 28, 2015
4,702
2,622
Irving, Texas
I disagree, a 135mm f1.4 need only have a 95mm front element, it’s not crazy like the larger than 100mm front elements on all the big whites. A 135mm f1.8 need only have a 75mm front element, or a 77mm filter thread.

Indeed the RF 28-70mm f2 has a 95mm front thread and is $3,000, I’d expect a 135mm f1.4 to be mechanically simpler, a similar size, lighter, and less costly. I’d guesstimate the $2,499 prince point. A 135mm f1.8 should be considerably cheaper than that, probably sub $2,000.
You only make my heart pump harder. ;) People seem to forget the Sigma 105mm f/1.4 and the price isn't out of line at $1,599. For a Canon? Anywhere from $2,699 - $4,000 would be fine with me. Can't take it with me. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MaximPhotoStudio

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
Nov 7, 2013
2,746
620
Germany
Does it come with a free trail for the gym ;)
Weight lifting might be recommendable :ROFLMAO:

Filter size about 95 to 105 mm, lenght 162,2 mm, approx. weight 1,5 kg +
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Del Paso