G
Guest
Guest
HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href=""></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="">Tweet</a></div>
<p>Patents with three popular telephoto lenses with the addition of image stabilization have shown up. It’s long been expected to see IS added to Canons highly regarded 135 f/2.0, I don’t know where a 2.8 will fit into the lineup, and adding stabilization to the 85 and 100 would follow with Canons current practice of sticking IS on all their mid-range glass.</p>
<p>Patent Publication No. 2014-10283
Publication date 2014.1.20
Filing date 2012.6.29</p>
<p>Example 1
Focal length f = 85.56mm
Fno. 1.86
Angle of view 2ω = 28.4 °
Image height Y = 21.635mm</p>
<p>Example 2
Focal length f = 102.06mm
Fno. 2.00
Angle of view 2ω = 23.9 °
Image height Y = 21.635mm</p>
<p>Example 3
Focal length f = 131.00mm
Fno. 2.80
Angle of view 2ω = 18.8 °
Image height Y = 21.635mm</p>
<p>Canon patents
Positive and negative positive
Inner Focus (group 2)
(Part of the third group) antivibration</p>
<p>Source: [<a href="http://egami.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2014-01-22" target="_blank">EG</a>]</p>
<p>Update: I accidentally read the135 f/2.8 as f/2.0, apologies for any potential false hope we brought.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>