scyrene said:
hbr said:
Remember a couple of years ago Canon was not happy with the sales of the original 6D and one of their executives said that the camera was going, "upscale."
The problem is that Canon went back to the thinking that this would be just an "enthusiast's" camera. Therefore they did not leave a good upgrade path for the people who bought the original and Canon decided that a few "gimmicks" would sell the camera to enough first time buyers to make the upgrade from APS-C worthwhile. This is the first time that I know of that Canon went backwards. Not the first they used gimmicks when they had no good sensor upgrade to offer. Secondly, one of the things that also helped the sales of the original was when a lot of professionals started to buy it as a cheaper second camera. That meant a lot of wedding photographers bought it. I realize that Canon does not consider the 6 series to be professional grade so, therefore, did not put in a second card slot. I think that had they done that, a lot of wedding photographers would buy the upgrade, (they still might, but won't be happy about it).
I wonder if Canon has pissed off the 4k crowd, (I think Canon still does not have a good working 4k system), and pissed off the wedding photographers and pissed off the purchasers of the original 6D if this version will be as good of a success as the first one.
I am in the pissed off crowd that is very unhappy about the lack of innovation this time around, but after a lot of agonizing have decided to buy one as the other features will help me with my style of photography,
Very sad, Canon
Brian
"Gimmicks"? "Lack of innovation"? They improved pretty much everything (notably autofocus and the addition of an articulating screen - both high on people's wish lists, from what we can gather from forum talk) except apparently this minor aspect of sensor design (and arguably adding a second slot). I think you've lost a bit of perspective.
scyrene, maybe I needed to elaborate a little more in my post. Firstly, I have pre-ordered the 6D II and as I said, I pretty much have decided to keep it due to the things you mention, but my agonizing has been whether to purchase the 5D III or the 6D II. I own both the 6D version 1 and the 7D II, and I even considered purchasing the 80D. Both of them are fantastic cameras and maybe I shouldn't upgrade.
The 80D would give me all the features of the 6D II, but IQ wise I believe the 6D is superior and the 7D II while not having the IQ of the newer 80D, it is by far a better camera.
The 5D III would give me the better focusing, speed and weather proofing over the 6D, but IQ wise I would not be much better off than what I already have. Plus If I want speed, the 7D II blows it out of the water.
I do want the increased resolution of the 6D II along with the better focusing and tilty flippy, but after 5 years of owning the 6D I expected a better sensor especially having the on chip ADC. IQ and signal to noise ratios are also very important to me.
Sony and Nikon seem to have much better sensors than Canon and Canon does not seem to catch up. For example, My sister in law owns the Nikon D7200 which is Nikon's equivalent to my 7d II. While the Canon is much more fun and easier to use, the IQ of the 7D II lags behind the D7200.
In the case of the 6D II there does not seem to be any innovation that I can see, The AF was already developed for other cameras. The tilty-flippy was already designed for other cameras. The touch screen had already been designed for other cameras. So it appears that Canon just cobbled together a few items from other cameras and along with a old style sensor, (although recently designed) put them all in the 6D II to save money. IQ is one of the reasons one purchases a FF camera over a crop sensor. If I was still into crop sensor cameras I would have purchased the 80D. If Canon is trying to protect their 5D IV then why were the original 6d and the 5D III so close to each other in the sensor performance. I am not the first one to say that Canon took a step backwards on the sensor design.
Anyway, yes, the 6D II is still a great camera and makes taking photos a lot easier than before, a lot of owners of the original 6D will not upgrade to the version II.
Sad