Re: Poll Added: Here's Why Canon Doesn't Need to Innovate, But it Does.
Oh yes, and I don't want to imply that it is always the camera that is the limiting factor. For a number of shots I take, the camera doesn't make the difference, can't blame the camera for those bad shots.
For my uses, it's more the video features that the Canon just doesn't have the option for, namely the full frame 4k and 120 fps video.
For most of my stills, the differences in dynamic range between Sony and the 5dmk4 are not the deciding factor, just not enough in it. It's the functional features that get it there. Didn't think I'd be saying the Canon offering isn't as functional as the Sony really
neuroanatomist said:Isaacheus said:The canons are decent reliable cameras, but there are things they just cannot shoot compared to other options in class.
There is a very important distinction between 'things they just cannot shoot' and 'things I just cannot shoot with them'.
I'm not saying the former is never true, but for the most part when people state the former, what they really mean is the latter. This was Keith's point earlier in the thread.
Oh yes, and I don't want to imply that it is always the camera that is the limiting factor. For a number of shots I take, the camera doesn't make the difference, can't blame the camera for those bad shots.
For my uses, it's more the video features that the Canon just doesn't have the option for, namely the full frame 4k and 120 fps video.
For most of my stills, the differences in dynamic range between Sony and the 5dmk4 are not the deciding factor, just not enough in it. It's the functional features that get it there. Didn't think I'd be saying the Canon offering isn't as functional as the Sony really
Upvote
0