I don't need to, using RF 85mm is exact equal to EF 85mm with IS turn off. (in real world usage)
Now we wait for:
RF 35mm F1.2 L
RF 14-21mm F1.4 L or RF 16-28mm F2
If the R is going to remain as a $2200 body, the replacement should be popular. I expect that the rumor of a new naming scheme portends a higher price.
The lower price for a R right now certainly makes it a bargain, I bought mine when first announced at a $200 discount.
this is how i've felt for years. as a landscape photo guy, i dont need IBIS or any video options, and it sucks to keep paying higher prices for something i dont want or use. we've got dedicated video lines, now all our still cameras are hybrid video/stills cameras. i dont think it's too much to hope for dedicated stills cameras again.As a photographer these specs are great.
i'd prefer less or crippled video specs and a better price though.
Its a curse for photographers to upgrade their camera and pay more just for video specs.
Like the 5D IV that came out more expensive because it shoots 4k video that i never used and videographers never were happy with it.
i dont think it's too much to hope for dedicated stills cameras again.