Don Haines said:i agreeahsanford said:ahsanford said:If this is true, why the hell wouldn't Canon bring that up in the launch video? Mirrorless schmirrorless, DPAF is in LiveView right now and if Canon could tout better LiveView performance, why didn't they?
This would totally be a top-line selling point.
Obviously the electronics is upgraded, there is more computing power so it can IS better, and if the algorithms for AF have also been improved, then one would expect better AF performance.....
We need a better AF testing database.
1) Time to run the full focus distance
2) Time to lock/confirm
3) Hit rate, hopefully as a function of aperture (choose a few? wide open, f/2.8, f/5.6?)
4) Hit rate at center vs. peripheral points
5) General statements on accuracy, if large AFMA adjustments were needed, etc.
6) Performance of Servo vs. One Shot (really hard to quantify, presume this would be observations only)
And then all that again under LiveView.
LensTip gives us (1) and a bit of (3) (usually at f/2.8.) while rather rarely making comments on the other points.
But if the internet can give me tabulated testing on Sony fps / buffer performance on JPG vs. compressed RAW vs. uncompressed RAW, the internet can give me this, too. ;D
- A
Upvote
0