Rokinon 14mm?

bf said:
I've heard good reviews on it. Dustin and Surapon had good feedback on it: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=21647

It's arguably the best lens on ef-m mount for capturing stars.

Thanks for that. The only drawback I see is it's manual everything and no metadata. Just have to write the settings down after each shot
 
Upvote 0
twagn said:
What exactly was that "something" in settings?

Sorry, twagn, I didn't see this again once the issue was resolved. As rpt said, it's a setting to enable shutter release without lens attached. Works just fine.

I'd caution that you don't want to keep that setting enabled as it may cause inadvertent problems when releasing the shutter isn't what you want happening. I enable it only when the manual lens is on the body.
 
Upvote 0

bf

Jul 30, 2014
298
69
twagn said:
bf said:
I've heard good reviews on it. Dustin and Surapon had good feedback on it: http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=21647

It's arguably the best lens on ef-m mount for capturing stars.

Thanks for that. The only drawback I see is it's manual everything and no metadata. Just have to write the settings down after each shot

I agree with you and I wish the chip they include to transfer med-data becomes standard in their products.

I personally went with ef-m 11-22 and Rokinon 8 mm f2.8 II lenses. 11-22 is much more practical and modern lens. 8 mm gave me the opportunity to experience a circular ultra-wide perspective on this APSC sensor and playing with distortion.
 
Upvote 0