Show your Bird Portraits

Thanks Jack.
Always good to get encouragement (or a stick)!
I'm moving some logs to a vantage point so I can feed them with suet. Wish me luck with my red heads.
Also, the yummy finally came back, more than a week late than in the past years, and even now, only one. Still, one is better than none. The weather is still poor, neighbour said that his rain gage reported over 3 inches of rain with this storm.
-r

Jack Douglas said:
Thanks guys. And now for some serious color after all that drab grey. This morning, snowing and poor light but still...

And for encouragement for Riley.

Jack
 
Upvote 0
DominoDude said:
Eldar said:
DominoDude said:
Eldar said:
This is a very rare visitor on these shores. We´ve been lucky to have one couple nesting by a river close to where I live. I got up at 6am this morning and headed out, with a couple of "lunatic" comments from my wife. 0C/32F and a cold breeze made it a chilling experience. The bird appeared a number of times and I have lots of shots. Finally it decided to sit down in the sun and I could get my ISO sufficiently down to benefit from the 5DSR resolution. It lives on the other side of the river, where access is impossible, so a lot of cropping was required.

5DSR, 600mm f4L IS II + 2xIII extender. 1/400s, f/9.0, ISO200

Great shot of the female Kingfisher, Eldar!
If you're lucky they'll nest at least one more time and you could get great shots of the young ones as they start to dart around. I'm guessing the riverside on the other side consists of light clay and sand and that's why they've decided to dig out their nest there.

I haven't looked yet in the BIF-section, but any luck getting BIF shots with that lens+extender combination? With their speed and typical flight behaviour I can imagine that is a bit of a nightmare...
Thanks DominoDude.
I was not sure how to determine the sex, but I suppose then that the male has the darker bill.

No, BIF with this lens combo (5DSR with 600 f4L IS II + 2xIII extender) is almost theoretically impossible, with only one AF point, unless it is a cory bustard or a slow gliding eagle.

The problem with this nesting place, exactly as you described it, is that the river is a bit too wide to get acceptable shots with anything less than 840mm. So the only chance I have is to find a place where it goes for a steady dive for fish. Then I can set focus manually and use the 1DX-II at full throttle. I was considering getting a floating hide, but that is still just a thought.

Here is a Red Breasted Merganser, from the same trip.

1DX-II, 600mm f4L IS II + 1.4xIII extender. 1/250s, f/5.6, ISO2500

First, the Red breasted Merganser is superb, both as a photo and as a bird. Don't think we have that one here.

Yes, female Kingfishers have the lower bill orange during nesting season, except for the outer part. Male's are all black, both upper and lower. Young ones look like the males, but have grey feet.

I have a similar place that I found late last year; a creek that widens and where the water slows down. I have been able to see the holes in the river bank from across the other side, but it is something like 30-40m across to the far side. Finding a suitable shooting location is hard and the sun will only hit that river bank during early hours. I only have my 400/5.6L on crop sensor to shoot with so everything must be in harmony for successful photos. I have walked up and down the creek for 3-4kilometers looking for dead tree branches sticking up from the water or bare branches hanging out over the water - all places where the adults could be imagined to rest while looking out for fish.
A photographer friend has even gone so far as to dragging his own tree stump (a sizeable piece of wood) to a place close to the sea where he has shoved the stump down near reeds, and at a known distance he has also placed a beach chair in the water - slightly obscured in the reeds - so that he can sit down in the water and know exactly where the bird will perch, and the distance can be preset on the lens. Then he just have to wait for Kingfishers.

Good luck with yours, Eldar! I bet your wife still will have plenty of opportunities to call you crazy before you get just the shot you want from your Kingfisher - they are tough to shoot, but worth it.
I have seen the kingfisher flying up-river and I expect he has a good fishing spot there. I have followed him/her, but not seen any diving activity so far. Rome was not conquered in one day, so I guess I´ll continue my pursuit :)

Here´s another, shot earlier in the morning.

1DX-II, 600 f4L IS II + 2xIII, 1/250s, F/8.0, ISO4.000
 

Attachments

  • _V4I0024.jpg
    _V4I0024.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 112
Upvote 0
Jul 29, 2012
17,744
6,433
Canada
Eldar said:
I have seen the kingfisher flying up-river and I expect he has a good fishing spot there. I have followed him/her, but not seen any diving activity so far. Rome was not conquered in one day, so I guess I´ll continue my pursuit :)

Here´s another, shot earlier in the morning.

1DX-II, 600 f4L IS II + 2xIII, 1/250s, F/8.0, ISO4.000

Beautiful bird. Lovely shot. :)
 
Upvote 0

tron

CR Pro
Nov 8, 2011
5,223
1,616
Eldar said:
tron said:
Hello Eldar, do you use a tripod or monopod with your 600 II 2XIII combination?
I use a RRS TVC34 tripod, with a RRS PG-02 FG. I sometimes also use PG-02-LLG gimbal.
Thanks for letting me know. I assume you use your car a lot and do not walk too much. I am going on an excursion for bird watching but since I will be with a group and I will not have a car I am thinking that bringing my 500II with 1.4III, 2XIII and gitzo systematic 3541ls must not be comfortable (we will be using bus and walking) so I consider 400 DO II with 1.4XIII (and 2XIII) as an alternative. Contrary to the previous combination I have been able to handhold the latter one. It also fits in a much smaller bag. But the 500II 2XIII has given me very good results when used on tripod or on my car's window (in solo mini trips).
 
Upvote 0
tron said:
Eldar said:
tron said:
Hello Eldar, do you use a tripod or monopod with your 600 II 2XIII combination?
I use a RRS TVC34 tripod, with a RRS PG-02 FG. I sometimes also use PG-02-LLG gimbal.
Thanks for letting me know. I assume you use your car a lot and do not walk too much. I am going on an excursion for bird watching but since I will be with a group and I will not have a car I am thinking that bringing my 500II with 1.4III, 2XIII and gitzo systematic 3541ls must not be comfortable (we will be using bus and walking) so I consider 400 DO II with 1.4XIII (and 2XIII) as an alternative. Contrary to the previous combination I have been able to handhold the latter one. It also fits in a much smaller bag. But the 500II 2XIII has given me very good results when used on tripod or on my car's window (in solo mini trips).
When I use the 1DX-II or 5DIV, I have no problem using a small and light Benro gimbal (sidekick) on a Gitzo monopod. But with the 5DSR and only one focusing point, I prefer the tripod/gimbal, especially when staying put on one location, like with the Kingfisher. Normally though, I can assure you, I walk/hike a lot. I carry the 600mm with me on hikes many miles long. I do not handhold much at 1200mm, but I do that regularly on 840mm.
 
Upvote 0

AlanF

Desperately seeking birds
CR Pro
Aug 16, 2012
12,441
22,879
Jack Douglas said:
AlanF said:
Whitethroat 5DSR/100-400mm II @560mm

Great detail. What ISO?

Jack

My bog standard 640. I leave the EXIF on every photo so you can download and get all the settings. I really do like the 5DSR. If you get too close and have excessive detail with all the barbs showing on the feathers, you can get Moire. But for these further off shots that's never a problem and it wins out on extracting what detail there is.
 
Upvote 0

Jack Douglas

CR for the Humour
Apr 10, 2013
6,980
2,602
Alberta, Canada
AlanF said:
Jack Douglas said:
AlanF said:
Whitethroat 5DSR/100-400mm II @560mm

Great detail. What ISO?

Jack

My bog standard 640. I leave the EXIF on every photo so you can download and get all the settings. I really do like the 5DSR. If you get too close and have excessive detail with all the barbs showing on the feathers, you can get Moire. But for these further off shots that's never a problem and it wins out on extracting what detail there is.

Thanks Alan. You know I've been pretty critical of the 1DX2 but as time passes a few key points have been surfacing about my expectations. For example, I have made many references and comparisons to my 6D and the shots I got with it using 300 X2. Fortunately, I remember distinctly from some winter shots, that I did not like the results I was getting at ISO 1600 or above, especially if cropping was significant. Well, I'm now shooting the 1DX2 up to ISO 3200 and finding the results to be surprisingly acceptable. Likewise I was having AF issues but I was shooting backlit in low light at high ISOs so maybe expecting too much. Not to mention doing a lot of AF @ F8 with off center focus points. Still not 100% sure though.
 
Upvote 0