From a visit to the aquarium, well duh...
Through 40cm thick glass at 1.4, not too shabby IQ.
Through 40cm thick glass at 1.4, not too shabby IQ.
Upvote
0
Viggo said:From a visit to the aquarium, well duh...
Through 40cm thick glass at 1.4, not too shabby IQ.
TWI by Dustin Abbott said:Viggo said:From a visit to the aquarium, well duh...
Through 40cm thick glass at 1.4, not too shabby IQ.
Not bad at all. That's awesome!
Viggo said:Thanks! I love this lens more and more each day. I'm buying a second copy 35 Art over the weekend, hopefully the AF doesn't suck like the first 35 and the first 50 ;D At least now I have the docking and I know that they can work and be epic.
wickidwombat said:Viggo said:Thanks! I love this lens more and more each day. I'm buying a second copy 35 Art over the weekend, hopefully the AF doesn't suck like the first 35 and the first 50 ;D At least now I have the docking and I know that they can work and be epic.
I don't think you will regret the 35 it's AF in servo is amazing and my copy just never misses focus i cant wait to see what they do with the 85! it needs some wide open improvements and AF could be made better over the current version
Viggo said:Sorry to hear that Eldar, I wish you could borrow my 50 and see for yourself, but fully understand you have up, I mean the 35 is not even considered anywhere in the future for me.
localhost said:Viggo said:Sorry to hear that Eldar, I wish you could borrow my 50 and see for yourself, but fully understand you have up, I mean the 35 is not even considered anywhere in the future for me.
Viggo: do you have any problems with Sigma 50 and 1dx? I've read about focus inconsistency when using 50 Art and 1dx and 5dIII.
Viggo said:, I mean the 35 is not even considered anywhere in the future for me.
dlee13 said:Viggo said:, I mean the 35 is not even considered anywhere in the future for me.
That's why I went for the Canon 35mm f2 IS, the AF is always spot on, IQ is great and I never have to worry about missing focus.
Viggo said:dlee13 said:Viggo said:, I mean the 35 is not even considered anywhere in the future for me.
That's why I went for the Canon 35mm f2 IS, the AF is always spot on, IQ is great and I never have to worry about missing focus.
It's just too big a difference in dof for me to use an f2 instead of 1.4. I would buy another 35 L, but I love the 50 so I can wait for a 35 L II.
The f2 aperture was the reason I sold my Zeiss 50mp, it's just not the same pop.
Jim Saunders said:For having spent some more time with it, I now regard mine as worth the investment.
Jim
Not by design, cat under one arm, trigger in the other.dlee13 said:Jim Saunders said:For having spent some more time with it, I now regard mine as worth the investment.
Jim
Hey Jim!
Were you focusing on the cats eyes here?
dlee13 said:I'm not sure if it's me but the image looks almost like it's very soft or not in focus.
Jim Saunders said:Not by design, cat under one arm, trigger in the other.dlee13 said:Jim Saunders said:For having spent some more time with it, I now regard mine as worth the investment.
Jim
Hey Jim!
Were you focusing on the cats eyes here?
dlee13 said:I'm not sure if it's me but the image looks almost like it's very soft or not in focus.
You tell me. Dialing the shutter speed up might have helped, but given the choice between 1/250 and a happy cat versus HSS and claws, I'll take the happy cat.
Jim