Supertelephoto Lens Updates Are Getting Closer [CR1]

Canon Rumors Guy

Canon EOS 40D
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
10,766
3,150
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
Updates to Canon’s line of “big white lenses” is getting closer we’re told. Some of these new lenses will be present at the World Cup in Russia, which begins on June 14.</p>
<p>We generally assume the “big whites” as the following lenses.</p>
<ul>
<li>EF 200mm f/2L IS</li>
<li>EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II</li>
<li>EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II</li>
<li>EF 500mm f/4L IS II</li>
<li>EF 600mm f/4L IS II</li>
<li>EF 800mm f/5.6L IS</li>
</ul>
<p>We weren’t told which lenses would be in testing, but we highly doubt all of these lenses would be tested at World Cup games. It makes sense that 300mm to 600mm lenses could potentially be used.</p>
<p>If you’re watching the matches, keep a close eye on the sidelines.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
 

docsmith

CR Pro
Sep 17, 2010
1,215
1,071
briangus said:
hope not the 200 F2 as just bought one a couple of hours ago

Congratulations on the new glass!!

I am in a bit of the same boat as I am about to buy either the 500 f/4 II or 600 f/4 II.

But, amazing lenses will still be amazing after the new releases. I would also expect Canon to charge a nice premium for the new lenses.
 
Upvote 0

jolyonralph

Game Boy Camera
CR Pro
Aug 25, 2015
1,423
944
London, UK
www.everyothershot.com
The EF 800mm and the EF 200mm are the oldest designs, being 2008 vintage. The 300 and 400 2.8 lenses are both 2010, and the 500 and 600 are 2011 vintage - but the dates are so close they probably all share the same level of technology.

800mm f/5.6 IS (2008) new design
200mm f/2 IS (2008) replaced 200mm f/2 (1996) - 12 year gap
300mm f/2.8 IS II (2010) replaced 300mm f/2.8 IS (1999) - 11 year gap
400mm f/2.8 IS II (2010) replaced 400mm f/2.8 IS (1999) - 11 year gap
500mm f/4 IS II (2011) replaced 500mm f/4 IS (1999) - 12 year gap
600mm f/4 IS II (2011) replaced 600mm f/4 IS (1999) - 12 year gap

So we're between 7 to 10 years gap now, would make sense that they're starting to redesign the lenses. Considering the number that would be needed by Canon's premium customers for the major sporting events and the time taken to make them I think it's going to be a while before any of these updates make their way to the shops.
 
Upvote 0

davidcl0nel

Canon R5, 17 TSE, RF35+85 IS, RF70-200 4 IS, EF135
Jan 11, 2014
219
95
Berlin
www.flickr.com
jolyonralph said:
200mm f/2.8 IS (2008) replaced 200mm f/2.8 (1996) - 12 year gap
This lens has no IS, but it should be. ;)

I only think that there would be an update, if there is a major redesign like DO to get it lighter/shorter.

And if there is a replacement, there I expect a much higher price - so if I am currently in the decision to buy one "old" lens, it would be no difference, or do you would wait 2 years to pay the double price instead to get a even better version? Yes double like 24-70 II or 35 L BR...
And I even think a 70-200 III would be in the 3-4k range.
 
Upvote 0

RGF

How you relate to the issue, is the issue.
Jul 13, 2012
2,820
39
jolyonralph said:
The EF 800mm and the EF 200mm are the oldest designs, being 2008 vintage. The 300 and 400 2.8 lenses are both 2010, and the 500 and 600 are 2011 vintage - but the dates are so close they probably all share the same level of technology.

800mm f/5.6 IS (2008) new design
200mm f/2.8 IS (2008) replaced 200mm f/2.8 (1996) - 12 year gap
300mm f/2.8 IS II (2010) replaced 300mm f/2.8 IS (1999) - 11 year gap
400mm f/2.8 IS II (2010) replaced 400mm f/2.8 IS (1999) - 11 year gap
500mm f/4 IS II (2011) replaced 500mm f/4 IS (1999) - 12 year gap
600mm f/4 IS II (2011) replaced 600mm f/4 IS (1999) - 12 year gap

So we're between 7 to 10 years gap now, would make sense that they're starting to redesign the lenses. Considering the number that would be needed by Canon's premium customers for the major sporting events and the time taken to make them I think it's going to be a while before any of these updates make their way to the shops.

what will the new lenses offer? Yes they can be a tad sharper, slightly lighter (to get bragging rights over Nikon), but overall will there be a significant improvements or just a slight improvement? Will these lenses have drop in 1.4 converters? Now that would be sweat!
 
Upvote 0

docsmith

CR Pro
Sep 17, 2010
1,215
1,071
RGF said:
what will the new lenses offer? Yes they can be a tad sharper, slightly lighter (to get bragging rights over Nikon), but overall will there be a significant improvements or just a slight improvement? Will these lenses have drop in 1.4 converters? Now that would be sweat!

The general assumption I've seen has been that they will include diffractive optice (DO) which has the potential to make the lenses both lighter and shorter. The front element will need to stay the same. I had thought that Canon might introduce DO alternative options rather than replace the Big Whites such as 500 or 600 f/5.6 DO, granted, Canon did exhibit a demo 600 f/4 DO 3 years ago.


Canon could easily have something else up their sleeves, as you say, a built in 1.4TC, other ways of shedding weight/size. But, generally, new=better with Canon. So count me as excited to see what they have in the pipeline.

Granted, what I really want to see is a $3-4k 200-600 f/5.6 L IS USM. Great IQ, blazing fast AF. ;D
 
Upvote 0

jolyonralph

Game Boy Camera
CR Pro
Aug 25, 2015
1,423
944
London, UK
www.everyothershot.com
RGF said:
what will the new lenses offer? Yes they can be a tad sharper, slightly lighter (to get bragging rights over Nikon), but overall will there be a significant improvements or just a slight improvement?

Just a slight improvement, I'd say. Most likely in focus speed and accuracy and overall resolution. If the Nikon lenses are only 2% better than the Canon, Canon only have to make these lenses 4% better (however you wish to measure this) to regain the crown - and yes, that does matter.
 
Upvote 0

AlanF

Desperately seeking birds
CR Pro
Aug 16, 2012
12,301
22,372
jolyonralph said:
RGF said:
what will the new lenses offer? Yes they can be a tad sharper, slightly lighter (to get bragging rights over Nikon), but overall will there be a significant improvements or just a slight improvement?

Just a slight improvement, I'd say. Most likely in focus speed and accuracy and overall resolution. If the Nikon lenses are only 2% better than the Canon, Canon only have to make these lenses 4% better (however you wish to measure this) to regain the crown - and yes, that does matter.

Who is complaining that the Canon superteles are not as good as Nikon? Nikon is seriously ahead on body ratings (D850 and D500) but not lenses.
 
Upvote 0

ethanz

1DX II
CR Pro
Apr 12, 2016
1,194
510
ethanzentz.com
kaihp said:
Canon Rumors said:
We generally assume the “big whites” as the following lenses.
  • EF 200mm f/2L IS
  • EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II
  • EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II
  • EF 500mm f/4L IS II
  • EF 600mm f/4L IS II
  • EF 800mm f/5.6L IS

Why wouldn't the 200-400 f/4L IS USM not be included in that list?

Discrimination!
 
Upvote 0

tron

CR Pro
Nov 8, 2011
5,222
1,616
Canon Rumors said:
Updates to Canon’s line of “big white lenses” is getting closer we’re told. Some of these new lenses will be present at the World Cup in Russia, which begins on June 14.</p>
<p>We generally assume the “big whites” as the following lenses.</p>
<ul>
<li>EF 200mm f/2L IS</li>
<li>EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II</li>
<li>EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II</li>
<li>EF 500mm f/4L IS II</li>
<li>EF 600mm f/4L IS II</li>
<li>EF 800mm f/5.6L IS</li>
</ul>
<p>We weren’t told which lenses would be in testing, but we highly doubt all of these lenses would be tested at World Cup games. It makes sense that 300mm to 600mm lenses could potentially be used.</p>
<p>If you’re watching the matches, keep a close eye on the sidelines.</p>
<span id="pty_trigger"></span>
Regarding 300, 400, 500 and 600 this seems a little stupid. Sorry! The only obsolete are the 200 and the 800. Also a 600 DO could be possible but it would coexist with its non DO brother (but this tread is not about it). Just like the 100-400 II rumor that kept appearing every year. The 300 to 600 lenses wouldn't get much of an upgrade because they are already very good (and significant lighter than their previous versions). Add to the fact that they still have the latest IS (4 stop) and they have nothing to gain from a version III. Don't get me wrong. Canon could decide anything they want (=seems profitable) but who would upgrade an excellent lens to an ... excellent lens?
 
Upvote 0

Hector1970

CR Pro
Mar 22, 2012
1,554
1,162
I expect Canon will bring out something new in the Super Tele but it won't replace them all together.
As to improvements. I have the 300 and 600 and they are brilliant.
The 600 II even though lighter than a 600 I is still a beast of a lens.
I bought it this year even there were rumors of a new 600 back then because there is only a limited number of years left that I could cart it around so I needed to start right away.
It has revised by concept of a heavy lens.
It makes the 300mm II and 100-400 II feel like lightweight lens.
It would be fascinating if Canon would make it even lighter in the next version.
DO would be the most likely way to do that.
A 600mm is like an Aircraft Carrier once you have one you need a whole load of other things to get to be used properly (Planes / support ships etc). You need a Gimbal head, a bean bag, a bag big enough to carry it safely. A photographic assistant / weightlifter would be handy too.
I don't think owning these lens makes you a better photographer but you are left with no excuses.
They are superb pieces of engineering and only the photographer can improve.
Those clever engineers in Canon may have something up their sleeves - it will be interesting to see.
 
Upvote 0

ethanz

1DX II
CR Pro
Apr 12, 2016
1,194
510
ethanzentz.com
Hector1970 said:
I bought it this year even there were rumors of a new 600 back then because there is only a limited number of years left that I could cart it around so I needed to start right away.

Haha, that is a great reason to buy the lens.


Hector1970 said:
It has revised by concept of a heavy lens.
It makes the 300mm II and 100-400 II feel like lightweight lens.

Yes, these big boy lenses change your concept of lens weight.


Hector1970 said:
A 600mm is like an Aircraft Carrier once you have one you need a whole load of other things to get to be used properly (Planes / support ships etc). You need a Gimbal head, a bean bag, a bag big enough to carry it safely. A photographic assistant / weightlifter would be handy too.

You are right. I've spent more on various accessories for my 200-400 than I have on some of my lenses. The weightlifting doesn't seem to help at all with carrying the lens for longer...
 
Upvote 0