The RF 70-200 f2.8 L IS

Larsskv

EOS 7D MK II
Jun 12, 2015
773
197
I am excited to report that I have received my RF 70-200 f2.8 L IS today.

I love the size and weight of it. The EOS R and the RF 70-200 is shorter than the 5DIV with the 200 f2.8 LII attached. It balances nicely even without the battery grip.

The IS seems to be outstanding. The build appears to be top notch.

The AF is very fast, and it is very quiet.

With regards to image quality, I haven't been able to take any serious test pictures yet, but I did some hand held indoor test shots for checking the far corner performance, and it seems to do great at f 2.8 at all focal lengths.

For those of you who have read the pre review made by the digital picture, you may have noticed that Bryan complains about missing steel bearings for the tripod ring. I for one appreciate Canons decision on the construction of the tripod ring; the lens is designed with the priority of not using it. By that I mean that the lens has no physical elements (steel bearings) sticking out when the mount is of, making the lens look and feel much nicer when the tripod ring is detached. Those of you who use a 70-200 on a tripod will definitely agree with Bryan though...

After playing with I have little doubt that this lens is a slam dunk for Canon.
 

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
Nov 7, 2013
2,650
462
Germany
Thank you for letting us know about your first impressions.

Please keep us updated wit hmore info and first sample shots.
 

Larsskv

EOS 7D MK II
Jun 12, 2015
773
197
This is not the time of year for outdoor photography where I live, but I got a few shots this weekend. Nothing exciting, but perhaps better than nothing:

https://flic.kr/p/2hQT2fr
https://flic.kr/p/2hQWwuw
https://flic.kr/p/2hQWwuS
In real world use, I find the lens to be sharp at all focal lengths, all the way to the corners.

I did take some family portrait photos with it as well. I am not sharing those, but I can honestly say the ones I did take look really good, and I am spoiled with the RF 50 f1.2 and RF 85 f1.2.

So far I have only praise for this lens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maximilian

Maximilian

The dark side - I've been there
Nov 7, 2013
2,650
462
Germany
This is not the time of year for outdoor photography where I live, but I got a few shots this weekend.
It's all about taking the time to find an interesting subject. Even in autumn.

Nothing exciting, but perhaps better than nothing:
At least the duck pic is really great. Good light, good colors, I can see, how the bokeh is behaving.
Good eye (y)

I did take some family portrait photos with it as well. I am not sharing those,
Fully agree and understand. Same opinion here.

but I can honestly say the ones I did take look really good, and I am spoiled with the RF 50 f1.2 and RF 85 f1.2.
That sounds really great.

Thanks for sharing and have a lot of fun with that piece of glass. :)
 

Viggo

EOS 5D SR
Dec 13, 2010
4,225
789
I had a chance to look at the 70-200 the other day. It’s a highly interesting lens, even for me. But, is the IS suppose to be so slow to engage? I tried holding the camera very still before engaging also, but I had to wait 3-5 seconds before the viewfinder image was properly stabilized. The vertical IS engaged faster, so thought maybe the camera thought I was doing panning or something, but it was in mode 1. I’ve noticed this before if I’m moving a bit too much when engaging IS, but even standing very still it took forever...
 
Dec 5, 2019
1
1
Has anybody noticed frontfocus issues on the RF 70-200. Mine has frontfocus at 200m, F2,8 and distance near or less 1 meter.
The frontfocus is 5 mm approximately.

German and american forums have also lot of posts about this issue.
Also the new firmware 1.0.5 did not solve the issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viggo

Viggo

EOS 5D SR
Dec 13, 2010
4,225
789
Has anybody noticed frontfocus issues on the RF 70-200. Mine has frontfocus at 200m, F2,8 and distance near or less 1 meter.
The frontfocus is 5 mm approximately.

German and american forums have also lot of posts about this issue.
Also the new firmware 1.0.5 did not solve the issue.
Yeah, I also read about that. Seems like it’s a real issue since it’s already a lot of people experiencing it. It seems the issue and AF is incredibly consistent so the AF is at least very, very good. I’m sure it will be fixed with a lens firmware and the issue is gone.
 

jd7

EOS 7D MK II
Feb 3, 2013
747
109
I briefly handled an RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS in a shop today. I haven't really given it a proper test of course, but it seemed awesome to me. The lesser size (when retracted) and weight compared to the EF versions really did feel very substantial. It's almost enough to make me get over my dislike of EVFs and get an EOS R! :) Maybe if/when the RF gear gets a bit cheaper it might just be the thing which gets me there yet.

PS if there is any front focus issue, like Viggo I assume Canon will get it sorted out before too long
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viggo

Viggo

EOS 5D SR
Dec 13, 2010
4,225
789
I briefly handled an RF 70-200 f/2.8L IS in a shop today. I haven't really given it a proper test of course, but it seemed awesome to me. The lesser size (when retracted) and weight compared to the EF versions really did feel very substantial. It's almost enough to make me get over my dislike of EVFs and get an EOS R! :) Maybe if/when the RF gear gets a bit cheaper it might just be the thing which gets me there yet.

PS if there is any front focus issue, like Viggo I assume Canon will get it sorted out before too long
I felt the same way about it, 0.7m mfd, it’s small and lighter than my 85, seems like nicer bokeh than the EF’s, so I’m tempted .. I’m also tempted by the other 2/3 of the trinity ..