Probably, but I am semi-interested in the M6 II because I want a small travel camera, and also thinking about FF mirrorless. In other words, I'm torn in three ways but more pull towards 90D for sure.Are you buying the 90D for your bird photography?
Ah right, that is not quite as bad.however, looking at the details, this is the cameras with built-in, non-interchangeable lenses sales figures that took all the beatings here
fair enough.
Same hereSecureGSM - that animated GIF is driving me crazy - please change it for a still!
It means that they are likely still far from the bottom of the current fall.Most interesting to me is the fact that compared to the 1990ies and 80ies there are still a lot more ILC cameras and lenses sold in 2018
- even after the "fall of sales"
Doesn't bother me....SecureGSM - that animated GIF is driving me crazy - please change it for a still!
That means that in the 1990ies and 80ies several camera companies could make a living out of a much smaller market than today.It means that they are likely still far from the bottom of the current fall.
FixeratedSecureGSM - that animated GIF is driving me crazy - please change it for a still!
One reason why I stick with Canon. Canon and Nikon have a long history and have weathered past boom and bust cycles. They didn't just enter the market to take advantage of the temporary surge during the rise of digital.That means that in the 1990ies and 80ies several camera companies could make a living out of a much smaller market than today.
And from the Graphics I've posted it looks like the ILC market has almost reached it's bottom at about 10 mio cams and 30 mio lenses per annum.
And that is still at least 2 to 3 times more than in the 1990ies and 80ies, if not even more, depending on the year you look at.
FujiFilm managed it's way through the collapse of the film industry while remaining a profitable, independent and technologically competitive company. An extinction level event in their primary business that more or less wiped out all of their competitors. Hard to overstate how difficult that must have been. I think they'll survive the downturn in camera sales just fine.One reason why I stick with Canon. Canon and Nikon have a long history and have weathered past boom and bust cycles. They didn't just enter the market to take advantage of the temporary surge during the rise of digital.
Not necessarily as back then we were talking about film cameras. Therefore serious photography was still out of reach of many as the ongoing costs were far higher. The ease of taking and editing digital images is likely to mean more people are willing to make that initial outlay as ongoing costs are far more affordable.It means that they are likely still far from the bottom of the current fall.
When you take a look at the chart I've posted, please note (which you surely did) the different scaling on the right side for smartphones (x10 compared to cams):... Now even phones can't improve much - and it looks they already reached a peak too. ...
one does not buy a phone every one or two years
He should have got a Canon DSLR, which he would not leave at home.I gather that many folks get new phones to get better cameras. For me it makes more sense to spend the money on a new camera and keep the iPhone 6S a few more years.
I am traveling with a friend who left his Nikon DSLR at home and is shooting Europe with his iPhone 10.