They could make bargain one prime 500 5,6 for M mount . Plastic and simple 7 lens construction like old 400mm 5,6
that would be cool . Or zoom with minimal lens adding.
that would be cool . Or zoom with minimal lens adding.
Upvote
0
I tried the 100-400mm II on the M5, but the body is too small for me to hold comfortably. I need something as big as a 5D, 7D, or 80D series to hold to balance the lens.They could make bargain one prime 500 5,6 for M mount . Plastic and simple 7 lens construction like old 400mm 5,6
that would be cool . Or zoom with minimal lens adding.
They definitely need make light big flagship M camera for european male hands too. like 7d shaped but plastic camera without weather seal.I tried the 100-400mm II on the M5, but the body is too small for me to hold comfortably. I need something as big as a 5D, 7D, or 80D series to hold to balance the lens.
They definitely need make light big flagship M camera for european male hands too. like 7d shaped but plastic camera without weather seal.
Canon could divide 7d line to two ,M camera like 7d but light , And Rugged R serie 7 for hard enviroment users.
Most of us knew it was vapourware, I certainly haven’t been waiting.After waiting patiently for over two years (since the first rumors of a canon super zoom) I finally decided on the Tamron 150-600. It's a good enough lens that I've also decided maybe Tamron would be a good choice for other focal lengths - the 70-200 f2.8 in particular. Nearly equal optics at 50% of the Canon price is a powerful motivator.
isnt olympus like 7d but without mirror?Kinda like Olympus did?
Vaporware implies the product was announced, then neither released nor cancelled. In this case, the lens was merely rumored.
I was referring to the strangely huge (for a crop sensor cameram especially Micro 4/3) Olympus OM-D E-M1X .isnt olympus like 7d but without mirror?
Olympus cant make cheaper plastic version without weather sealing like canon could cause they got 2 mount what wont compete
Yeah it tries be 1dx2 with two battery grip and double buttons Its their 1 model.I was referring to the strangely huge (for a crop sensor cameram especially Micro 4/3) Olympus OM-D E-M1X .
Quite a few people on this site seem to think that a CR1 rumor means that Canon has promised to do something soon. For them, a CR1 rumor can make something seem like vaporware if it doesn't happen. Admittedly, it can be hard to keep it all straight, but it is helpful to remember that if it is a CR1 rumor, most likely Canon didn't have much to do with starting that rumor. Generally speaking, if Canon says it is going to do something, it isn't a rumor.
But it seems the 100-400 L IS II has one of the very best IS available, I quite often use mine at 400 mm and "crazy" shutter speeds, like 1/30th, without any issues! So, F.8 with the 1,4 X extender is not a problem.The question I would have with a lens of this nature is, what quality would it have that would steer me away from my Sigma Contemporary 150-600. In terms of size and weight, and price, it's hard to beat.
I mean, that's where many of us birders are at. Something long, adequate brightness (well, I'd like a larger aperture, but not at the cost of weight), easy to carry, and reasonably sharp.
My 150-600 isn't quite as sharp as my 100-400, but in order to get close to 600 with the Canon, I need to deal with an f/8 lens. While the cameras will focus at f/8, you're giving up light which translates into either a slower shutter or higher ISO. In darker scenes, that is a problem.
Yes because as a photographer I find the EF range of L lenses very limiting...
I find the IS on my 100-400mm II at least a stop better than on my Sigma 150-600mm C. Also the Canon stabilises the image in the viewfinder much better - it is rock solid stable but that from the Sigma wobbles around, even after tweaking. The IS on the zoom also seems slightly better than that on my 400mm DO II.But it seems the 100-400 L IS II has one of the very best IS available, I quite often use mine at 400 mm and "crazy" shutter speeds, like 1/30th, without any issues! So, F.8 with the 1,4 X extender is not a problem.
I would not even think of using a Sigma instead!
I am with you on the Canon 100-400, it was my favorite and most used. The new Sony 200-600 is only a G series and would not be expected to be as sharp or expensive as it's GM cousins. Don't be fooled by the white body, there is a difference in price and expected performance. The Sony GMs are more aligned to L glass and usually cost a bit more. Actually all the Sony glass is kind of expensive so it was a bit of a surprise at the 2k cost of this 200-600 offering.
Competition is a good thing.
Don't get too excited. Sony is 31 years behind Canon with a 600mm. It will take a century for Sony to catch up. Sony is doomed. (Pure sarcasm from the perspective of Sony trolls who make such stupid statements about Canon in the mirrorless world.)Lol this is a pathetic thread.. i m currently drooling over sony's new lenses..
The truth? Huh? Hmmmm... Better how? Asking for a friend, because he wants to know if there is a Sony to EF / or Sony to RF adapter... because somebody told him the Sony lens is better. He doesn't know why it is supposed to be better, but he saw somebody type it up on a forum before the lens was ever even released and knows he can always trust forum dwellers when they say something is better... even when those dwellers have zero experience with the product. Again: ZERO EXPERIENCE WITH THE PRODUCT. (Like people who bash the 6D Mark II / RP and have never even seen one)Its funny how people always find a way to defend Canon, no matter what. The truth is that Sony suddenly has better option with the 200-600.
The new Sony 200-600 is only a G series and would not be expected to be as sharp or expensive as it's GM cousins. Don't be fooled by the white body, there is a difference in price and expected performance. The Sony GMs are more aligned to L glass and usually cost a bit more. Actually all the Sony glass is kind of expensive so it was a bit of a surprise at the 2k cost of this 200-600 offering.
I think they both released their first 600/4 lenses in 1988.Don't get too excited. Sony is 31 years behind Canon with a 600mm.