it would be pretty hard to decide which posts were helpful,
;;;though the idea is cool, rather than quantitative, if it could be qualitative
;;;though the idea is cool, rather than quantitative, if it could be qualitative
Upvote
0
CR Backup Admin said:Marsu42 said:Some other forums have a minimum quote/own content relation ratio, but I guess that's not possible with the current cr software.
I have not been able to limit the size of a quotation field, or to remove images that are included in a quote thru the standard moderator interface. Its probably possible to modify the program to do this, but then, with every new version of SMF, it will have to be modified and tested, and fooling around with things like that commonly break a large forum like CR.
Strange things creep in all the time from some seemingly unrelated change.
Aglet said:maybe some little boxing-glove icons could be added in there too, for adversarial and combative posters.
candc said:The yellow boxes are a members dxo score so its possible to have a higher number of posts with a lower overall score.
candc said:The yellow boxes are a members dxo score so its possible to have a higher number of posts with a lower overall score.
AcutancePhotography said:candc said:The yellow boxes are a members dxo score so its possible to have a higher number of posts with a lower overall score.
So posters with more yellow boxes have more DR?
DR - Derailing Replies
I can live with that. ;D
Marsu42 said:serendipidy said:Mt Spokane has nine. Is that the most you can get?
I don't get it. Is it only based on recent activity? Or on seniority (reg time)?
neuro - ~15k posts = 8 points
spokane ~10k posts = 9 points
Bwaaa Ha Ha Haaaa!!RustyTheGeek said:someday!! ;D ;D ;DRustyTheGeek said:neuro's post count...RustyTheGeek said:I'll reach...Mt Spokane Photography said:Marsu42 said:Agree. :->Tabor Warren Photography said:Yes. ;DJane said:So what CR Admin is saying is that it's the number of posts not the quality that counts??? While many of the top contributors have really valuable input, it's easy for anyone to just say "nice picture" or something equally unmeaty to boost their post counts and enter exclusive circles. Really??
That's how it works, but I really have not seen a issue with those with hundreds of posts trying to build up their numbers. Its not a problem in any event, the moderators read a lot of posts and know who is who among frequent posters.
RustyTheGeek said:Bwaaa Ha Ha Haaaa!!RustyTheGeek said:someday!! ;D ;D ;DRustyTheGeek said:neuro's post count...RustyTheGeek said:I'll reach...Mt Spokane Photography said:Marsu42 said:Agree. :->Tabor Warren Photography said:Yes. ;DJane said:So what CR Admin is saying is that it's the number of posts not the quality that counts??? While many of the top contributors have really valuable input, it's easy for anyone to just say "nice picture" or something equally unmeaty to boost their post counts and enter exclusive circles. Really??
That's how it works, but I really have not seen a issue with those with hundreds of posts trying to build up their numbers. Its not a problem in any event, the moderators read a lot of posts and know who is who among frequent posters.
dstppy said:Aglet said:maybe some little boxing-glove icons could be added in there too, for adversarial and combative posters.
We had a Karma system for that. Then adversarial people would go through and click all of your posts negative.
Saying something nice about Apple was an immediate penalty.