YuengLinger said:I will buy the f2.8 version, but not this slow poke.
That lens will be Canon enthusiasts' next unicorn.
Upvote
0
YuengLinger said:I will buy the f2.8 version, but not this slow poke.
I also have the Sigma 12-24 (MkI) and I bring it out a few times a year. It's a fun lens though commercially acceptable output can only be realised shooting at f/11. Wide open it looks like soup. If the new 11-24 f/4 can deliver the goods at f/4, then I'm a buyer. It will open up possibilities you wouldn't bother attempting with the Sigma. The clincher would be if it comfortably out-performs my current 16-35 f/2.8II which delivers kind of acceptable files. Beyond f/5.6 my old 17-40 outperformed my 16-35 f/2.8II. Darn! I should have kept it!mackguyver said:I'm planning to stay up tomorrow night just so I can be one of the first to preorder this badboy. I can see myself making good money with one of my clients who always loved my Sigma 12-24 II work.
Anyone else plan to buy one?
RLPhoto said:The 16-35mm F/4L is plenty for my needs.
YuengLinger said:I will buy the f2.8 version, but not this slow poke.
The 16-35 f/4L IS is fine for my needs, along with my 15mm FishEye. I'm an enthusiastic amateur and I've already spent more than I ever thought I would spend on photography gear.SwnSng said:It all depends on the reviews. I rather have the canon 100-400mm first because little league season is right around the corner. Meanwhile, i'm quite happy with the Nikon 14-24mm even though it's not that fun to actually use.
CaptureWhatYouSee said:11 is way too wide for a FF.... the supposed target buyer.
16 is borderline usable.
I'd buy it for $500 as a novelty.
zlatko said:CaptureWhatYouSee said:11 is way too wide for a FF.... the supposed target buyer.
16 is borderline usable.
I'd buy it for $500 as a novelty.
11mm is way too wide for me too. The widest I like is 20mm.
mackguyver said:Since we have one for the 5Ds bodies, why not one have one for the lens.
I'm planning to stay up tomorrow night just so I can be one of the first to preorder this badboy. I can see myself making good money with one of my clients who always loved my Sigma 12-24 II work.
Anyone else plan to buy one?
Eldar said:I have never felt the need for something wider than 15mm (I didn´t believe I needed that either ...),