N
Neeneko
Guest
This is sorta the inverse of the 'why so much hate for VDSLRs' thread, since it got me wondering.. why so much hate for dedicated still cameras?
In general the people asking for a stills-only camera are not suggesting multimedia cameras shouldn't exist, they just want something optimized for their use case.. so why is this so offensive, or why are people so defensive about their preferred combination of features?
Is it really that threatening to have other choices on the market? Does it really have to be all or nothing? Is it insecurity or fear that if Canon produces both types that they will no longer cater to the needs of videographers? Is it begin threatened that other use cases have a voice which leads to less of their own? Is it riding the high of being a major design focus and not wanting it to end? Is it simply discomfort at being reminded that there are more types of photography and thus their one twue way might not be the type of the market? Is it techno elitism and the ego bruising that goes along with that (anyone who follows slashdot can see what happens when someone *gasp* does not see the obvious greatness in someone's favorite tech..)?
I am really curious why people seem to feel it is so important that their market segment eradicate another, and that space can not be shared.
In general the people asking for a stills-only camera are not suggesting multimedia cameras shouldn't exist, they just want something optimized for their use case.. so why is this so offensive, or why are people so defensive about their preferred combination of features?
Is it really that threatening to have other choices on the market? Does it really have to be all or nothing? Is it insecurity or fear that if Canon produces both types that they will no longer cater to the needs of videographers? Is it begin threatened that other use cases have a voice which leads to less of their own? Is it riding the high of being a major design focus and not wanting it to end? Is it simply discomfort at being reminded that there are more types of photography and thus their one twue way might not be the type of the market? Is it techno elitism and the ego bruising that goes along with that (anyone who follows slashdot can see what happens when someone *gasp* does not see the obvious greatness in someone's favorite tech..)?
I am really curious why people seem to feel it is so important that their market segment eradicate another, and that space can not be shared.