I am battling with the concept (myth?) that lower MP equates to cleaner photos at higher ISO.
What is the truth? Thank you.
What is the truth? Thank you.
Can we ever really know the truth?...What is the truth?...
Thank you all. Appreciate it. So I will take it that: I do not need to get a lower MP camera for night shots where I need higher ISO. For example NY subway stations, inside restaurants, late evening street photography.
Sure, both sides have written a lot. But I have yet to see an example for two images from comparable cameras (same sensor size, roughly same generation sensor) where a difference in resolution results in a differennce in noticeable noise when viewed at the same size.I really don't know that there is a definitive answer. There are people on both sides of the question that make statements with absolute certainty.
That's only true, if you actually do crop more. If you don't, it doesn't hold. Then you just have a lot of high resolution keepers. But I guess the assumption is that you would go for 45 MP because you do in fact crop severely often (wildlife and so on), so then it makes sense.The truth is: keepers from R5 will be noisier on average, because you will be able to crop more.