Sinsear said:That doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If what you said is true, then that means when Canon does a rebate, less people will buy the camera as the price will be more. Therefore, Canon would anticipate overall less sales with the rebate. So if that was true, then Canon would deter potential sales by releasing the rebate. Why would they want to halt sales?CameraAddict said:No worries if you already bought the camera. You likely didn't miss out on a discount. Dealers are notorious about raising prices at rebate time. The claim is that Canon makes them do it.
Prior to the last rebate at Christmastime the 7D body-only was $1499USD. Rebate time jacked the price to $1699 and then the $100 rebate brought the price back down to $1599, a higher price than the pre-rebate one. Once the rebate ended, the price went all the way down to $1469.
I've found that LENS rebates are actually true rebates....
In the worst case scenario, they (being the retailers) keep the price the same and simply keep the entire rebate for themselves. But it makes no sense whatsoever that they would RAISE the price, because they'll be shooting themselves in the foot.
ELK said:Sinsear said:That doesn't make a whole lot of sense. If what you said is true, then that means when Canon does a rebate, less people will buy the camera as the price will be more. Therefore, Canon would anticipate overall less sales with the rebate. So if that was true, then Canon would deter potential sales by releasing the rebate. Why would they want to halt sales?CameraAddict said:No worries if you already bought the camera. You likely didn't miss out on a discount. Dealers are notorious about raising prices at rebate time. The claim is that Canon makes them do it.
Prior to the last rebate at Christmastime the 7D body-only was $1499USD. Rebate time jacked the price to $1699 and then the $100 rebate brought the price back down to $1599, a higher price than the pre-rebate one. Once the rebate ended, the price went all the way down to $1469.
I've found that LENS rebates are actually true rebates....
In the worst case scenario, they (being the retailers) keep the price the same and simply keep the entire rebate for themselves. But it makes no sense whatsoever that they would RAISE the price, because they'll be shooting themselves in the foot.
What CameraAddict says IS TRUE, I monitored the prices too, so that was absolutely the scenario he describes. So a comment like "it doen't make much sense", doesn't make much sense at all!sorry for pun
![]()
EYEONE said:10mb/s isn't the fastest SD card. I have a 30mb/S SD card.
bvukich said:EYEONE said:10mb/s isn't the fastest SD card. I have a 30mb/S SD card.
Watch your units. 10Mb/s is not equal to 10MB/sec.
30mb/s is approximately equal to 3MB/s which is class 3.
neuroanatomist said:bvukich said:EYEONE said:10mb/s isn't the fastest SD card. I have a 30mb/S SD card.
Watch your units. 10Mb/s is not equal to 10MB/sec.
30mb/s is approximately equal to 3MB/s which is class 3.
The current SanDisk Extreme SDHC cards are rated at 30 MB/s (that's big-B Bytes, not little-b bits!). That's the same as the (discontinued) SanDisk Extreme III CF cards.
SanDisk has also just launched a new Extreme Pro SDHC card with a rating of 45 MB/s. That's the same rating as the (also discontinued) SanDisk Extreme IV CF cards.
So, while it's true that the fastest SDHC cards don't quite reach 60 MB/s UDMA speeds, they are half as fast the Extreme Pro 90MB/s UDMA6 CF cards. If you really crave speed and storage, consider the new 100 MB/s UDMA7 card from SanDisk...of course, you would spend less on a new 7D...
niko said:Tranfer rates are determined by the weakest component in the path and I do not believe that the camera tech/hardware is able to push data at those rates (yet and probably intentional). This greatly diminshes the memory card rating importance as the specified transfer rated are not (and probably never will be) achieved in actual usage. There is probably not that much difference in use between a mid level and a high level card (say 60 and 100 MB/s)
Also the manufacturers tend to exagurate (a little) and actual vs. theoretical in real world scenarios are (quite) different.
scalesusa said:They were in the fall rebates as well. it probably has more to do with nikon rebates and the need to match them.
The 60d is a new model, and 7D is not that old. They won't be replaced this year.
Macadameane said:scalesusa said:They were in the fall rebates as well. it probably has more to do with nikon rebates and the need to match them.
The 60d is a new model, and 7D is not that old. They won't be replaced this year.
Agreed, the 7D isn't that old. I think it's funny, many posters saying "I don't to get a 7D because its getting dated"
gavinjackson said:Do you think they're doing rebates to clear out the stock because a new camera is on the horizon? Is there a history of rebate timing and new announcements?
Tristan944 said:Well we should find out tonight at 9pm or 12am PST if the rebate is actually happening and if the dealers are going to keep prices the same or raise them. I sure hope they keep them the same so the $200 7D rebate will actually save $200.