• UPDATE



    The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being.

    I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

70-200mm f/2.8L IS II chromatic aberration

Status
Not open for further replies.
Since getting the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II last winter, this lens has been the most used lens. It's my first L and I love everything about it... except the chromatic aberration. One of the specs on the lens was that it was improved to minimize chromatic aberration. I guess 'minimize' is the key word because to me I feel like there is a good deal of chromatic fringing -equal to the amount I get from photos using the 55-250mm based off my experience.

But maybe I expected too much and maybe if I used the 55-250mm the color fringing would be even worse. At first I ignored it but lately when I edit photos, those purple fringes are really annoying. But I could be overreacting.

I'm not sure exactly how to do a 100% crop so I'm print screening what I see at 100%. This is unedited:
http://img689.imageshack.us/img689/7417/cafringing1.png
 
I really haven't noticed much CA with my 70-200 MkII, definitely WAY less than with my 50L, 85L.

However, if you are bothered by it, use DPP's DLO (Digital Lens Optimizer) module, which works even much better than DPP's CA correction module.
 
Upvote 0
cheeseheadsaint said:
I guess 'minimize' is the key word because to me I feel like there is a good deal of chromatic fringing

Just use Lightroom 4.1RC2 with its new CA reduction and lens profiles, problem solved. CAs and vignetting aren't a problem if you do any postprocessing other than Microsoft paint, leaving only sharpness & focus (af on body & lens) to worry about.
 
Upvote 0
What you're seeing is purple fringing. The lens has no lateral chromatic abberation, but all long lenses suffer from purple fringing except for the Canon supertelephoto lenses and Leica APO lenses. If the lens corrected for purple fringing it would cost $11,000, and weight 3 times as much and be a cousin of the 200-400mm f/4.0 IS TC that's coming out.

Just correct it with DXO mark or lightroom.

On an related note, I would pay $10,000 for a 200-400mm f/4.0 TC with a wider focal length and faster aperture, say a 70-200mm f/2.0 IS TC :)
 
Upvote 0
Radiating said:
What you're seeing is purple fringing. The lens has no lateral chromatic abberation, but all long lenses suffer from purple fringing except for the Canon supertelephoto lenses and Leica APO lenses. If the lens corrected for purple fringing it would cost $11,000, and weight 3 times as much and be a cousin of the 200-400mm f/4.0 IS TC that's coming out.

Just correct it with DXO mark or lightroom.

On an related note, I would pay $10,000 for a 200-400mm f/4.0 TC with a wider focal length and faster aperture, say a 70-200mm f/2.0 IS TC :)
The only time I saw as much fringing as that, was with my old Carl Zeiss Jena 70-300 with 3x converter and I use telephoto lenses all the time.
 
Upvote 0
cheeseheadsaint said:
I used B+W MRC haze filter... do you guys think that might be the problem? :/

and I always thought chromatic aberration and color fringing were the same thing? How can you tell color fringing from chromatic aberration?

I use that same filter on my 70-200 II without any problems.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.