A dpr member was given an pre-prod 1DXII to fiddle with.
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57264293
Intresting statements:
Update # 3: Noise
So far I have found nothing in what I opened Rawy (admittedly much I was looking for) so I can make a comparison with the JPG off noise reduction (High ISO Noise Reduction: Disabled). findings:
Noise level looks a lot like predecessors 1D X. It is possible that the sharp firmware will still have some improvements, but I would not count on it.
Noise is up to ISO 25600 practically monochromatic, gone are the sort of large, colored spots, which are poorly eliminate the postprocessing. This may indicate DR promised better (cleaner shadows), or just better noise reduction. Anyway, this is good news.
ISO 102 400 and my come higher useful, as in 1D X.
Update # 4: The noise in the RAW
RAW Therapeutics (ghastly program, btw) can be read from Rawy 1D X Mark II. Small compared to the 1D X and demonstration of what happens when the shadows compensation in postprocessing +5 EV. Progress is clearly visible!
I will be putting everything on my blog as well. It's in czech, but you can use Google translator:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=cs&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.martinkozak.com%2F2016%2F02%2Fcanon-eos-1d-x-mark-ii-prvni-dojmy%2F&edit-text=
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=cs&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.martinkozak.com%2F2016%2F02%2Fcanon-eos-1d-x-mark-ii-prvni-dojmy%2F&edit-text=
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57264293
Intresting statements:
Update # 3: Noise
So far I have found nothing in what I opened Rawy (admittedly much I was looking for) so I can make a comparison with the JPG off noise reduction (High ISO Noise Reduction: Disabled). findings:
Noise level looks a lot like predecessors 1D X. It is possible that the sharp firmware will still have some improvements, but I would not count on it.
Noise is up to ISO 25600 practically monochromatic, gone are the sort of large, colored spots, which are poorly eliminate the postprocessing. This may indicate DR promised better (cleaner shadows), or just better noise reduction. Anyway, this is good news.
ISO 102 400 and my come higher useful, as in 1D X.
Update # 4: The noise in the RAW
RAW Therapeutics (ghastly program, btw) can be read from Rawy 1D X Mark II. Small compared to the 1D X and demonstration of what happens when the shadows compensation in postprocessing +5 EV. Progress is clearly visible!
I will be putting everything on my blog as well. It's in czech, but you can use Google translator:
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=cs&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.martinkozak.com%2F2016%2F02%2Fcanon-eos-1d-x-mark-ii-prvni-dojmy%2F&edit-text=
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=cs&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=cs&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.martinkozak.com%2F2016%2F02%2Fcanon-eos-1d-x-mark-ii-prvni-dojmy%2F&edit-text=
