HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin: 70px 0 0 0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/09/a-week-in-rumors/"></g:plusone></div><div id="fb_share_1" style="float: right; margin: 0 -50px 0 10px;"><a name="fb_share" type="box_count" share_url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/09/a-week-in-rumors/" href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php">Share</a></div><div><script src="http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/connect.php/js/FB.Share" type="text/javascript"></script></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2011/09/a-week-in-rumors/"></a></div>
<strong>Lots came in
</strong>I have received a lot of small rumors throughout the week. There’s till life out there, even if there isn’t anything overly exciting.</p>
<p>I’ll break them down.</p>
<p><strong>DIGIC V
</strong>Apparently DIGIC V will be powering the next Canon DSLRs. We all expect better noise reduction and processing speed, however there is also a “brand new featureâ€. I’m still waiting to find out what that is.</p>
<p><strong>PowerShot G12 Replacement
</strong>There will be no G12 replacement in 2011.</p>
<p><strong>2011 DSLR?
</strong>Most information I am receiving now seems to suggest there will be no DSLR announcement in 2011. There are definitely a lot of prototype bodies out there, we just won’t be hearing about them until 2012.</p>
<p>It was suggested this was to make sure Canon could meet the production demands that the Christmas and holiday  seasons require.</p>
<p>It was also flatly said that “Canon will announce a new camera when it’s done, and not a minute beforeâ€. Canon has no desire to announce a camera and it not be available for 2-3 months.</p>
<p><strong>Canon Mirrorless
</strong>The R&D is ongoing. There is no prototype cameras out to photographers though.</p>
<p><strong>EF 24-70 f/2.8L II</strong>
Apparently in the October 2011 Popular Photography issue, they wrote a reference to an EF 24-70 f/2.8L IS II. I haven’t seen the magazine, but generally dismiss this sort of thing as a typo. I’ve never received solid info that the version II would have IS.</p>
<p><strong>*UPDATE*</strong> As pointed out by a reader, any 24-70 with IS wouldn’t be designated with a “IIâ€. I hate missing the obvious. :)</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>