Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS in Development? [CR1]

[Canon Rumors]

We’ve heard from a few different places over the last few months that an EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS is currently under development. At the time of the EF 24-70 f/2.8L II launch, there was a lot of talk that an IS version of the lens existed. We had then heard Canon planned to have 4 new versions of the 24-70 focal range. We got the EF 24-70 f/4L IS, which surprised a lot of people and then the EF 24-105 f/3.5-5.6 IS STM arrived, which we consider the basic focal range with a little bit of a broader appeal. We do have the EF 24-105 f/4L IS, but it’s not part of the new lens designs at Canon.</p>
<p>With Nikon rumored to be finishing development on a Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8 PF VR, it seems unlikely Canon would leave such a lens out of their lineup, a lineup they’re very proud of.</p>
<p>We’re also told that an IS version of the EF 24-70 f/2.8L II would not replace the non-stabilized version, and would probably cost a lot.</p>
<p>There is no timetable and some grains of salt are probably required with this one.</p>

 

[super_newbie_pro]

Good new. But... If we could have a 24-70mm f/2.8L II is ($$$$ ), i hope the 24-70mm f/2.8L IS will be affordable... Yes, we can dream... But why not propose a 24-70 f/2.8 IS (no L for better price) affordable for 500-700€/$ like the 24-105 ?

 

[leGreve]

If it's not going to replace the non-IS version, I remain happy that the next A7S II will probably have in-camara IS and therefore we won't need the IS lens

 

[mb66energy]

After looking at the first 5Ds(R) samples I see a lot of "unsharpness" which is directional - from moving subjects or cameras. So IMO IS is a must for these cameras if you need high resolution moderate action photographs in non-perfect light.

I think something like
24 - 70 IS + 100 Macro + 100 - 400 IS
with 2 or 3 bodies would be a a great combo which fits into a small photo back pack and gives a lot of
creative freedom ...

On the other hand: a 20 - 70 4.0 IS USM would serve MY NEEDS better because I use mainly tele but would like a wider "universal" lens for overviews ...

 

[super_newbie_pro]

On the other hand: a 20 - 70 4.0 IS USM

Excellent idea ! Agree for the IS USM but no F4, F/2.8 !

 

[Masa@CanonRMRs]

Opps.

I just ordered EF24-70mm F2.8L II USM and they said I have to wait four months.
I have EF24-70mm F4L IS USM and planning to sell it when I get F2.8L II.

Should I cancell the F2.8L II and wait for new F2.8L IS model?
Question is, when the IS model gonna hit market...

 

[WorkonSunday]

going wider 24mm may be difficult from design point of view. but i think 24-85mm F4 is do-able (contax had a 24-85mm but F3.5 -5.6).

i quite like the current 24-70mm F4, i only wish it is as sharp as the bigger f2.8.

 

[Canon Rumors]

Opps.

I just ordered EF24-70mm F2.8L II USM and they said I have to wait four months.
I have EF24-70mm F4L IS USM and planning to sell it when I get F2.8L II.

Should I cancell the F2.8L II and wait for new F2.8L IS model?
Question is, when the IS model gonna hit market...

Please do not make buying decisions based on a [CR1] post. By the sounds of what I've heard, such a lens is more than a year away.

 

[siegsAR]

Hmmm.. Filter thread size? ???

 

[LSXPhotog]

Opps.

I just ordered EF24-70mm F2.8L II USM and they said I have to wait four months.
I have EF24-70mm F4L IS USM and planning to sell it when I get F2.8L II.

Should I cancell the F2.8L II and wait for new F2.8L IS model?
Question is, when the IS model gonna hit market...

I would cancel your order and buy from somewhere else. That lens should be in stock everywhere.

When Canon released the Mark II without IS, I knew I wouldn't be forking over the cash for it. Even hating the design of the previous model, I feel that it makes more sense until an IS version comes out.

Sigma is also rumored to be working on its own 24-70 f/2.8 IS Art lens. Some even claim it will be an f/2? That's doubtful considering the weight and size needs for an extra stop of light. However, I'd take f/2 and no IS than f2.8 with it.

Just imagine a zoom lens that fast for covering events and weddings. You could almost toss the 24, 35, and 50 primes! Mmmmm...I need to stop dreaming!

 

[dolina]

Finally a 24-70 worth getting.

 

[photogaz]

I've got a Tamron 24-70 and couldn't be happier. So glad I didn't buy the 24-70 Cannon. The IS is a godsend.

 

[Maximilian]

Exept for price and weight I'd be most curious about the difference in IQ between the IS and the non-IS version.
The IQ would be the buying factor to me, more than IS. (But luckily I don't have to bother about that, as I am more interested in other lenses )

 

[Masa@CanonRMRs]

Opps.

I just ordered EF24-70mm F2.8L II USM and they said I have to wait four months.
I have EF24-70mm F4L IS USM and planning to sell it when I get F2.8L II.

Should I cancell the F2.8L II and wait for new F2.8L IS model?
Question is, when the IS model gonna hit market...

Please do not make buying decisions based on a [CR1] post. By the sounds of what I've heard, such a lens is more than a year away.

What a quick response, lol.
Thank you, CanonRumors.

 

[Masa@CanonRMRs]

Opps.

I just ordered EF24-70mm F2.8L II USM and they said I have to wait four months.
I have EF24-70mm F4L IS USM and planning to sell it when I get F2.8L II.

Should I cancell the F2.8L II and wait for new F2.8L IS model?
Question is, when the IS model gonna hit market...

I would cancel your order and buy from somewhere else. That lens should be in stock everywhere.

When Canon released the Mark II without IS, I knew I wouldn't be forking over the cash for it. Even hating the design of the previous model, I feel that it makes more sense until an IS version comes out.

Sigma is also rumored to be working on its own 24-70 f/2.8 IS Art lens. Some even claim it will be an f/2? That's doubtful considering the weight and size needs for an extra stop of light. However, I'd take f/2 and no IS than f2.8 with it.

Just imagine a zoom lens that fast for covering events and weddings. You could almost toss the 24, 35, and 50 primes! Mmmmm...I need to stop dreaming!

Thank you, LSX.
But in Japan, there is no stock anywhere.
I can't risk of "no warranty", so I shouldn't buy it from U.S.

I will wait four months and let's see when "Canon's new IS model" and "Sigma's Art-lense" will be on market.

Thanks again.

 

[Rancorous]

Yeah, and with Sigma supposedly developing a 24-70mm f/2.8 with OS, Canon had better up the ante. That being said, I'll gladly go for the Sigma. I already own the 18-35mm and the 50mm Art series lenses.

 

[JonAustin]

... i think 24-85mm F4 is do-able ...

Well, since the Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS celebrates its 10th birthday in about four months, yes, I would say that a 24-85mm f4 is certainly "do-able."

(contax had a 24-85mm but F3.5 -5.6).

And Canon had an even better (max aperture-wise) 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5.

 

[Justhandguns]

Oh! My silver 24-85 3.5-4.5 is still alive! That is a decent lens with one of the first few non L-lens to have a moulded non-spherical element.

I still do not understand why Canon did no introduce IS into the 24-70 2.8 lens from the beginning as they are so much in to videos. IS actually helps a lot when you handhold your camera doing videos.

 

[GMCPhotographics]

Yeah, and with Sigma supposedly developing a 24-70mm f/2.8 with OS, Canon had better up the ante. That being said, I'll gladly go for the Sigma. I already own the 18-35mm and the 50mm Art series lenses.

Not really..only in the amateur market. The pro market wouldn't even look at the Sigma. Sigma is well regarded as being over heavy, inconsistent Quality Control in manufacturing, Inconsistent AF (across their lens portfolio), more fragile mechanical compared to Canon and certainly more risk. The pro support network for Sigma is roughly 3 weeks for a repair with no option to rent or supply a loaner in the mean time. CPS offer a far better service and Canon L lenses offer a superior Pro product with far less business risk attached to it. Add to the resale advantage of Canon...from a business point of view...Canon is the clear winner. I certainly wouldn't rely on any Sigma for one of my professional engagements. I just couldn't trust them as a brand in that context.

If you are in the market for a 24-70 and you are considering Tamron, Tokina, Sigma etc...then you are not a pro or are not taking a professional business view point with your kit choices.

 

[GMCPhotographics]

Oh! My silver 24-85 3.5-4.5 is still alive! That is a decent lens with one of the first few non L-lens to have a moulded non-spherical element.

I still do not understand why Canon did no introduce IS into the 24-70 2.8 lens from the beginning as they are so much in to videos. IS actually helps a lot when you handhold your camera doing videos.

Because in video...so few actually need f2.8. Usually they stop down a lot to gain DOF and even out focus drift.
Most are better served with a 24-105 LIS and 70-200 f4 LIS. They are lighter, IS and better ranges.