Canon EOS-1D X Mark III Summary
- Thread starter Canon Rumors Guy
- Start date
Is the first spec list not just literally the 1Dx mark II specs? The list with 20 megapixels even says Cfast 2.0 and 16 fps, and the mark III definitely uses CF Express. Also says no log recording. I cant find anything in the first "leaked" list that isn't from the 1DX mark II. The other spec list that says pixels not specified looks much more accurate.
Edit: as Pekr also just pointed out, Dual Digic 6+ is also the same as 1Dx mark II.
Edit: as Pekr also just pointed out, Dual Digic 6+ is also the same as 1Dx mark II.
Upvote
0
Very disappointed.... I have lots of Canon prime MKII lenses waiting for something by Canon on a par with Sony A9II which I also own.... I just hope the EOS PRO version doesn't disappoint 
https://canoncamerarumors.com/canon-eos-1d-x-mark-iii-specifications-leaked/
https://canoncamerarumors.com/canon-eos-1d-x-mark-iii-specifications-leaked/
Last edited:
Upvote
0
They are just posting anything again without verifying anything just to get more views.
Those are not the real specs, except the few that are on the end which were already presented with the development announcement.
People are already out shooting with the production version of the camera, so it is not that far off.
Those are not the real specs, except the few that are on the end which were already presented with the development announcement.
People are already out shooting with the production version of the camera, so it is not that far off.
Upvote
0
As others above, this deffo isn't the correct final spec. I can imagine retailers etc preparing the product page, creating a copy of the older model and editing from there in readiness. You want the page up and indexed by Google, even if final detail isn't ready for public view.
Upvote
0
Hmmm.... I do not think Canon would dare to make such an mini-evolution of their flag-ship. Not in an Olymic year in Japan. Alkso keep in mind the 24MP of the A9....
Cannot believe this are the final specs.
Where do they have these specs? Maybe someone wrot older specs into "specs sheets" as an placeholder
bhphotovideo writes: CFexpress
Cannot believe this are the final specs.
Where do they have these specs? Maybe someone wrot older specs into "specs sheets" as an placeholder
bhphotovideo writes: CFexpress
Last edited:
Upvote
0
I am surprised they are using dual digic6 processors. You would think after 4 years they could have done a bit better. I suspect this may contain some erroneous info.
Upvote
0
This is plain wrong. The specs does not include HEIC support and this is already a known feature,
Upvote
0
First reaction: Oh, come on Canon! Why? What's up with the mediocre spec advancements for another $5,500?
10 minutes later after considering all options: Well, I can't switch systems and lenses after spending all that money, and Canon did give me a few more fps and more focal points in live-view than the previous model, so...
But then yet, the real specs haven't been released yet, so there is still hope!....maybe.
10 minutes later after considering all options: Well, I can't switch systems and lenses after spending all that money, and Canon did give me a few more fps and more focal points in live-view than the previous model, so...
But then yet, the real specs haven't been released yet, so there is still hope!....maybe.
Attachments
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Good point!
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1512601-REG/canon_eos_1d_x_mark_iii.html/specs
However, reading through the specs, Canon is still holding back on the sensor resolution size for now!
Upvote
0
Similar threads
