Canon EOS 90D Specification List [CR1]
- Thread starter Canon Rumors Guy
- Start date
Aussie shooter
https://brettguyphotography.picfair.com/
Durf
Picture Taker - Image Maker
The only thing in that spec list that is half way 90D believable is perhaps the fps and the battery type.....
You might have to scratch the battery - the battery should be LP-E6N.The only thing in that spec list that is half way 90D believable is perhaps the fps and the battery type.....
I think it’s pretty funny that we can’t completely dismiss this as false. Canon makes such odd decisions at times that something as unlikely as this could be true.
We’re this a forum for another brand, I don’t think it would be paid much heed.
Doesn’t make it likely, of course, but we can bask in the prospect of surreal improbability in the absence of pro grade updates.
We’re this a forum for another brand, I don’t think it would be paid much heed.
Doesn’t make it likely, of course, but we can bask in the prospect of surreal improbability in the absence of pro grade updates.
I guess I don't get the whole video w/crop factor. For full-frame I can sort of see cropping. But why the need to crop 4K on a crop sensor? Or am I just dense? I'm not much of a video guy.
Im wondering if someone is mixing up live view mode with viewfinder mode. If this chip is what they say it is (very fast readouts) then there’s no reason why new digic chips couldn’t keep up. But I can’t see it as being mirrorless without it being an r mount.
That being said, maybe it has an R mount but the only packages for it include an adapter and EF-S lenses? If the sensor size is aps-c all of the current EF-S lenses will work fine. The full frame R lenses are not wide enough on the low end as they all start at 24.
That being said, maybe it has an R mount but the only packages for it include an adapter and EF-S lenses? If the sensor size is aps-c all of the current EF-S lenses will work fine. The full frame R lenses are not wide enough on the low end as they all start at 24.
mirrorless ef for birdlers makes kind of sense ,there isnt anyway any supertele for RF or tele converters.
Or rather there isnt M super teles and may take many year before there is. canon is busy with RF lenses many year.
Now why design two camera when can just put EF mount to m5ii and put 90d label
Or rather there isnt M super teles and may take many year before there is. canon is busy with RF lenses many year.
Now why design two camera when can just put EF mount to m5ii and put 90d label
Last edited:
Looks like the mixture of the 90D and M5 II, or M5 II itself. Worrying speculation about the missing DPAF. Now a technical quesiton - is DPAF a disadvantage in terms of DR? I mean - if Canon would go without the DPAF for its new generation of sensors, would high / low ISO performance benefit? Of course the question it, how their new AF system would effectively work then .....
Can't imagine the 90D will be missing DPAF or it will at least have some decent PDAF that is as good.
Mirrorless sonds a bit odd at this time. So the questionmarks seem quite right.
Everything else... why not?
We'll see... hopefully by the end of August.
Everything else... why not?
We'll see... hopefully by the end of August.
I don't think DPAF is negatively affecting dynamic range. With some clever tricks built into the sensor, it could even be beneficial.
But it is a weakness with respect to high framerate shooting. Canon basically has to read two images from the sensor, then do their focus calculations and combine the two images to one. That's why you don't get the 8fps on the EOS R with AF.
Similar threads
