I said in an earlier post, it may be that they are stating Effective Pixels rather than total pixels.Why would the new M be mixed up with the 90d? Wouldn't they just use the same sensor, which is the Canon way? I can't imagine why they'd make separate 31 and 32 inch aps-c sensors.
What would be the advantage of a mirrorless with EF mount? A mirrorless with R or M mount and EF adaptor would be much better.
I would think higher DR and DPAF both slows readout,more data needed get out sensor? so if you get both frame rate would be super slow?I don't think DPAF is negatively affecting dynamic range. With some clever tricks built into the sensor, it could even be beneficial.
But it is a weakness with respect to high framerate shooting. Canon basically has to read two images from the sensor, then do their focus calculations and combine the two images to one. That's why you don't get the 8fps on the EOS R with AF.
Interesting...
Firstly, maybe the registered 32.5mp sensor is listed as 31.2mp due to the IBIS?
I’d be incredibly surprised to see an EF mirrorless! If this is true, then Canon should not have bothered with the RF mount (yet) and just used their EF mount for their mirrorless range. Sure, the RF mount enables incredible lenses but Canons EF lenses are already pretty incredible so..
There is imo very low chance we will see EF mirrorless, unless we would have to consdier Canon being just insane. Why would they come up with RF mount then, risking by making it even an M mount incompatible? I still somehow can't accept the fact, that thre is no upgrade path for an M mount cameras. What is imo more likely, is the chance of an APS-C with a RF mount.
It does require more data but I don’t believe that affects DR as much. Dynamic Range has more to do with the minimum amount of photons needed to trigger the pixels while keeping the noise to a minimum.in fact, Canon has been working on quad pixel Autofocus technology for a while that could theoretically be saved separately so that software Pixel shifts that into a much bigger image programmatically.I would think higher DR and DPAF both slows readout,more data needed get out sensor? so if you get both frame rate would be super slow?
hey maybe its sony sensor with canon patents so no dpaf and no cropping =8k .
werent here earlier some fake rumours about backlighted 32mpix 7Diii
I guess I don't get the whole video w/crop factor. For full-frame I can sort of see cropping. But why the need to crop 4K on a crop sensor? Or am I just dense? I'm not much of a video guy.
The biggest impediment to doing this is simply that Canons sensor chip fabs are way, way, way behind Sony’s in the ‘die’ size. This makes each sweep of readouts from every pixel take way longer than Sony’s sensors do. That’s why the quality of the picture is nearly the same but the speed isnt.
These two things are unrelated.