Bluetooth doesn’t extend far enough reliably.How about master transmitter in the bodies (BT/wifi)!? can't be that hard....
Upvote
0
Bluetooth doesn’t extend far enough reliably.How about master transmitter in the bodies (BT/wifi)!? can't be that hard....
yeah ok... but Wifi would work really nice!.... I can't understand why this isn't in the bodies already... especially in the R5 & R6! Also the 5DIV has Wifi!Bluetooth doesn’t extend far enough reliably.
The lower power option they are making a noise about really is a gimmick though, I think I only wanted less power than 1/256th once and I achieved that by moving the flash back a couple of feet.
There are some nice features, the flash memory function, the battery, second curtain sync (though I have never missed not having it) the led modeling light etc etc, but it is too rich for my blood at this point and I am a pretty heavy 600EX-RT user, I own seven. Maybe if I did more event work and my order book looked strong but my current setup of 600’s and Einstein’s works well enough.
If I was in the $1,000 per flash price bracket then the Profoto seems to make more sense to me as it integrates with a complete lighting system of modifiers, much higher power strobes both battery and mains powered.
The lower power option they are making a noise about really is a gimmick though, I think I only wanted less power than 1/256th once and I achieved that by moving the flash back a couple of feet.
I wish i knew as much as you did about flash. It's been a frustrating learning experience, and I'm still bad. TTL is all over the place, and for the fast moving situations I shoot, manual is not an option.I wouldn't call it a gimmick at all.
For a start, I've done plenty of indoor portraits in very space-restrictive settings, including literal caves, where I've had to use multiple layers of diffusion to get the power down to basically cande-light ambient, which is adding more work and time to shoots where I'm already often working against the clock. Secondly, this allows the flash to be controlled in camera to pull off the same power level, including ETTL, which totally takes needing to move anything out of the equation and makes it a lot easier to do this off of just ETTL ratios between lights. Moving the flash also changes the spread, making the flash appear flatter than if it was just a lower power in the same spot.
With it working in ETTL, I can think of dozens of situations where I've been in very low-light environments and on-camera flash is way too powerful even at 1/256th. My normal ISO photographing dances for the newspaper is 6400, and I look forward to this allowing me to add a pop to the foreground using exposure compensation ETTL while keeping the ambient, colorful dance lights filling in the background. With technology today I really don't focus on portraits always ending up at ISO 100, and this makes it a lot easier to work a flash into a natural light F/1.2 portrait on the street at night for fill without having to stick a dozen diffusion gels overtop of it. To me this is an ideal natural-light flash as a news photographer, and I'm sure plenty of wedding photographers will feel very similarly about it, especially ones who typically lean towards natural light.
Well like I said I have needed lower than 1/256th power vary rarely and certainly nothing adjusting the aperture or moving the flash back a little haven't solved. Having said that I also carry diffusion/neutral density gels but can honestly say I have never used them other than to demonstrate what they do.I wouldn't call it a gimmick at all.
For a start, I've done plenty of indoor portraits in very space-restrictive settings, including literal caves, where I've had to use multiple layers of diffusion to get the power down to basically cande-light ambient, which is adding more work and time to shoots where I'm already often working against the clock. Secondly, this allows the flash to be controlled in camera to pull off the same power level, including ETTL, which totally takes needing to move anything out of the equation and makes it a lot easier to do this off of just ETTL ratios between lights. Moving the flash also changes the spread, making the flash appear flatter than if it was just a lower power in the same spot.
With it working in ETTL, I can think of dozens of situations where I've been in very low-light environments and on-camera flash is way too powerful even at 1/256th. My normal ISO photographing dances for the newspaper is 6400, and I look forward to this allowing me to add a pop to the foreground using exposure compensation ETTL while keeping the ambient, colorful dance lights filling in the background. With technology today I really don't focus on portraits always ending up at ISO 100, and this makes it a lot easier to work a flash into a natural light F/1.2 portrait on the street at night for fill without having to stick a dozen diffusion gels overtop of it. To me this is an ideal natural-light flash as a news photographer, and I'm sure plenty of wedding photographers will feel very similarly about it, especially ones who typically lean towards natural light.
Well like I said I have needed lower than 1/256th power vary rarely and certainly nothing adjusting the aperture or moving the flash back a little haven't solved. Having said that I also carry diffusion/neutral density gels but can honestly say I have never used them other than to demonstrate what they do.
I don't understand the second point, you can control any of the flashes from the camera now.
As for your other scenarios, it has been shown before that in ETTL the EX flashes will fire at less than 1/256th anyway, I suspect Canon have just opened up to manual selection what ETTL was always doing anyway.
But if it is a feature you need then all power to you, lower power isn't in the top 50 features I would have listed to Canon as important in a new flash.
For instance:-
Why doesn't it have a touch screen?
Why doesn't it have a screen that can display all five groups at the same time?
Why doesn't it have a button per group? You still have to scroll to see or control each group in turn!
Why didn't they go for a round head that would support many more modifiers?
Why don't they make modifiers or even more gels? We were promised more gels for the 600EX-RT, they never came.
Why are we still stuck with a scroll wheel/D pad main interface? How many times have you pushed when you wanted to scroll in the heat of the moment?
Why are we stuck with the same output as the 550EX from 1998? The only thing that changed was the zoom range.
Sure the EL-1 is a nice new flash with some interesting updates on the 600EX-RT II, but considering the competition in the market and the outstanding features and system wide output levels some third parties offer at a fraction of the price I think it is a hard sell and would be very reluctant to recommend it as a solid lighting investment at $1,099! Even if you insist on Canon here is my experience, I bought a brand new 600EX-RT II for $500 and sold it within a couple of months to buy three first generation 600EX-RT's secondhand!
I hadn't notice the red ring, well spotted, so of course it has to be more expensiveIt has a red ring, so there’s at least a $400 bump right there
Profoto's £1000 speedlight has sold well despite it being a little flakey. If this is solid, it has a market.
ha, glad I bought four 600 EX-RTs used recently for 150 - 200 € each.