Here is the Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM

stevelee

FT-QL
CR Pro
Jul 6, 2017
2,147
850
Davidson, NC
In late 2019 I was on a cruise ship leaving Venice as it got dark. I stood on my stateroom’s balcony and shot pictures with my G5X II. Most shots were taken at ISO 3200, as I recall, maybe some at 6400. The results were amazing. Small camera, moving ship, mostly in the dark, high ISO, what could go wrong?

Of course the inky sky was noisy. But there was no detail in the sky, so noise reduction was not a problem: just apply enough so it wasn’t annoying, but not enough that it looked artificial. For the 13” x 19” prints I made, it probably didn’t matter, since the sky was in gamut territory with very little subtlety on that printer. The lighted parts of the scene, Doge’s Palace, St. Mark’s, tower, etc., looked tack sharp.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slclick and AlanF

AlanF

Stay at home
CR Pro
Aug 16, 2012
8,668
11,621
In late 2019 I was on a cruise ship leaving Venice as it got dark. I stood on my stateroom’s balcony and shot pictures with my G5X II. Most shots were taken at ISO 3200, as I recall, maybe some at 6400. The results were amazing. Small camera, moving ship, mostly in the dark, high ISO, what could go wrong?

Of course the inky sky was noisy. But there was no detail in the sky, so noise reduction was not a problem: just apply enough so it wasn’t annoying, but not enough that it looked artificial. For the 13” x 19” prints I made, it probably didn’t matter, since the sky was in gamut territory with very little subtlety on that printer. The lighted parts of the scene, Doge’s Palace, St. Mark’s, tower, etc., looked tack sharp.
I use a 1" sensor camera occasionally for general purpose and for travel when I can't take a DSLR or FF ILC. At the long end, it has a 220mm f/4 lens. That is equivalent to a 400mm f/7.3 lens so it should perform in terms in noise, dof etc as about a 0.25 stop wider than the 400 f/8.;)
 

AJ

EOS RP
Sep 11, 2010
744
152
I guess I'm a bit late to the party. Anyhoo...
I wonder if we'll see this lens as a kit lens bundled with a camera, like the 75-300 of yesteryear. Say the RP plus 24-105/4-7.1 plus 100-400/5.6-8 combo deal. If so, wonder how much of extra you'll pay. Should be less than 649 USD?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EricN

SnowMiku

EOS M6 Mark II
Oct 4, 2020
95
64
f/5.6@100mm seems a bit slow when the old EF 70-300 IS II is f/4.5@100mm. But it is good to finally see a consumer 400mm, I wish they released a consumer zoom 400mm on EF.
 

justaCanonuser

Grab your camera, go out and shoot!
Feb 12, 2014
853
698
Frankfurt, Germany
As you are a physicist, you might be interested in that I calculated the MTF values of the different slow lenses based on the Airy diffraction and the sensor MTFs and posted here: https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/t...of-f-5-6-f-7-1-and-f-11-lenses-and-tcs.39118/ (I didn't allow for lens aberrations or the Bayer filter).
It's true that you see more advantage with lower resolution sensors of increasing focal length at expense of f-number. I found from actual measurements of putting the 2xTC on the RF 100-500mm and R5 that the resolution increased by ~40% on going from 500mm f/7.1 to 1000mm f/14.
Sorry for my delayed reply (I had to work on quantum simulation topics as a journalist). Very interesting, I missed your diffraction blur related threads. I love geek threads, if they are connected with optics and sensor tech. Thank you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlanF

xwxw

EOS M50
Nov 3, 2020
32
47
I did a size comparison to the latest 70-300 EF. It's probably 1-2cm longer than the EF. I think we could expect similar optical performance.

My guess was right. It's 19mm longer than the 70-300 II and about 10% lighter.