In-Depth Review: Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3 VC

Canon Rumors Guy

Canon EOS 40D
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
10,832
3,197
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
HTML:
<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/01/in-depth-review-tamron-150-600-f5-6-3-vc/"></g:plusone></div><div style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="vertical" data-url="http://www.canonrumors.com/2014/01/in-depth-review-tamron-150-600-f5-6-3-vc/">Tweet</a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.dustinabbott.net" target="_blank">Dustin Abbott</a> has sent us his in-depth review of <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1013956-REG/tamron_a011_c_sp_150_600mm_f_5_6_3_di.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Tamron’s brand new 150-600 f/5-6.3 VC</a> super telephoto zoom lens. This lens is receiving a lot of press for it’s range and killer price of $1069 USD.</p>
<p>Most everyone that is reviewing lens has been giving it very good reviews. No, it’s not going to perform as well as <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/973129-REG/canon_5176b002_ef_200_400mm_f_4l_is.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Canon’s 200-400 f/4L IS 1.4x</a>, but that lens costs about 10 times more!</p>
<p><strong>CR’s Take</strong>

I get asked a lot about what lens to buy, and one of the most asked is what super telephoto zoom to buy. Since the announcement and reviews  of the <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1013956-REG/tamron_a011_c_sp_150_600mm_f_5_6_3_di.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3 VC</a>, I have had a hard time recommending Canon’s long-in-the-tooth 100-400 f/4-5.6L IS. This is a great starting point for anyone wondering if or how they’d use the super telephoto focal lengths. Some people may find they sit in the 300mm range, others may find they never leave 600mm. If you spent a year with this Tamron, you may then have a better idea as to whether or not investing in one of the big Canon L’s is the right decision for your situation and pocketbook.</p>
<p>I think it’s very interesting watching Sigma and Tamron release lenses that are priced extremely competitively and give wonderful bang-for-the-buck performance. Your move Canon….</p>
<p><strong>Says Dustin

</strong><em>“I simply don’t have the budget to purchase many of the super-teles that cover this focal range, and furthermore, I don’t shoot this style of photography often enough to justify the expense even if I did.  But this lens hits a sweet spot for me.  It’s price is low enough to not only be affordable but also a small enough investment that you won’t feel like you have wasted your money if you aren’t shooting long distance every day.  So if you can’t afford a “super-tele”, how about an “ultra-tele” (that’s what Tamron is calling this lens segment)?  The preorder price in the United States is only $1069.  It is about $180 more here in Canada, but this lens represents such a tremendous value that I have had a serious conversation with a friend in the industry about how it is even possible for Tamron to make a profit at this price.  I personally wonder if they are not selling this lens at a loss to drive brand recognition.  It’s that good.”<strong>

</strong></em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.dustinabbott.net/2014/01/tamron-sp-150-600mm-f5-6-3-di-vc-usd-review/" target="_blank">Read the full review</a> | <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1013956-REG/tamron_a011_c_sp_150_600mm_f_5_6_3_di.html/bi/2466/kbid/3296" target="_blank">Tamron 150-600 f/5-6.3 VC at B&H Photo</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
 

TrabimanUK

In the words of Brian Johnson - "Shoot to thrill!"
Sep 19, 2013
198
0
Bristol, England
Cracking review! However, from my perspetive, I'm still interested in focussing on BIF when at 600mm. I'm not a birder, but if it is good for BIF, it'll be good for cheetah and other big cats running.

Just need someone to review that and if it's as good as the rest of Dustin's review, I might well get one. :)
 
Upvote 0
TrabimanUK said:
Cracking review! However, from my perspetive, I'm still interested in focussing on BIF when at 600mm. I'm not a birder, but if it is good for BIF, it'll be good for cheetah and other big cats running.

Just need someone to review that and if it's as good as the rest of Dustin's review, I might well get one. :)

Unfortunately BIF is hard to do this time of year where I live in Canada. There just aren't hardly any birds around! There also isn't any open water right now that might attract waterfowl. I'm afraid someone else will have to provide that kind of testing.
 
Upvote 0
Don Haines said:
Great review!

Your reviews have always been good, but this is the best one yet! Congratulations on a job well done!

I had to put a lot of time into this one, both because I believe it was important, but also because there wasn't other reviews out there to help build my knowledge base or fill in details. Looks like I should have also put some extra work into my server :)
 
Upvote 0
jthomson said:
Great review Dustin.

Looks like a winner. I already have one of the big primes, but I will be adding this as I find a zoom useful in some situations.

I too like a mix of zooms and primes for different applications. I've never owned one of the big primes, but I have no doubt that shooting one would a great pleasure.
 
Upvote 0
Just a note to everyone: the site is demanding too many processes from the server, causing some outages (intermittently). My web designer is working with me to attack this, so if you can't get through, please try again later. We will solve this so you can all have a chance to see the review. I sincerely apologize for the issue. I'm getting a wee bit more traffic than usual today ;)
 
Upvote 0
Thanks, Dustin.

My question is about the long-term reliability of this lens. Yes, it's got a 6-year warranty, but does Tamron have a reputation for honoring their warranties? Will it be unrepairable after the warranty expires? I.e., is this a 6-year consumable, or can I re-sell it with a clear conscience after 4 years if I choose to upgrade? Yes, I know all equipment eventually dies outright, but how long does Canon continue to provide repair service for their L lenses?

I'd consider getting this lens, but not if it's going to "wear out" after 6 years. Does anyone out there have experience with Tamron service, especially on older lenses?

Thanks again for the great review.
 
Upvote 0

Lee Jay

EOS 7D Mark II
Sep 22, 2011
2,250
175
One point I'd like to make.

My current "super telephoto" is the 70-200/2.8L IS II with 2x TC III. Together, these are 1,815g compared to the Tamron's 1,951g. I'm not sure that's really much difference.

I'm wondering how the VC works in regular 2-axis mode when tracking moving subjects. I use my Canon like this all the time and it works quite well. However, the specific implementation matters. Some lenses get jerky and jump around when tracking in 2-axis mode. I think I remember seeing this on the 18-270VC, which is why I'm wondering about it.
 
Upvote 0

Don Haines

Beware of cats with laser eyes!
Jun 4, 2012
8,246
1,939
Canada
TWI by Dustin Abbott said:
TrabimanUK said:
Cracking review! However, from my perspetive, I'm still interested in focussing on BIF when at 600mm. I'm not a birder, but if it is good for BIF, it'll be good for cheetah and other big cats running.

Just need someone to review that and if it's as good as the rest of Dustin's review, I might well get one. :)

Unfortunately BIF is hard to do this time of year where I live in Canada. There just aren't hardly any birds around! There also isn't any open water right now that might attract waterfowl. I'm afraid someone else will have to provide that kind of testing.
Funny you should say that.... I have a Snowy Owl hanging around and hope beyond all reasonable hope that by the time my lens (pre-ordered a month ago) arrives, that Snowy will still be around....

Even funnier, as I am waiting for a LONG!!! lens for birding, I was wandering around yesterday shooting Chickadees at 24mm.... yet I use them as justification for 600mm....
 
Upvote 0