• UPDATE



    The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being.

    I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

Lesson learnt on flare.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 22, 2012
4,789
1,573
40,538
I recently shot a backlit wrestling sequence on 5d2 with 24-105mm. Almost all the backlit photos have a strong flare. I had a UV filter on the lens.
I strongly suspect that this flare was there because of the filter. I wish I had shot without the filter.
Do you think the flair would have been less/not there if there was no filter?
More photos at http://greypartridgefilms.com/blog/wai-for-photographers/
 

Attachments

  • _MG_8905-copy-ps.jpg
    _MG_8905-copy-ps.jpg
    185 KB · Views: 1,918
The 24-105mm has some native flare, but yes, I agree that the filter contributed. Here are the results of some testing I did previously, using a B+W MRC filter (among the best available).



Flare is worse with the filter, and there is loss of contrast as a result.
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
The 24-105mm has some native flare, but yes, I agree that the filter contributed. Here are the results of some testing I did previously, using a B+W MRC filter (among the best available).



Flare is worse with the filter, and there is loss of contrast as a result.

Some recent 5d3 users report, that there is a better way to avoid flare :)
 

Attachments

  • flare.gif
    flare.gif
    3.5 KB · Views: 1,508
Upvote 0
marekjoz said:
Some recent 5d3 users report, that there is a better way to avoid flare :)

Ah, so that is what I have been doing wrong!
Heh.

Actually, I just did a shoot that had horrible flare and I have been trying to figure out what to do about it. Very frustrating...
 
Upvote 0
Z said:
I think your photos look pretty badass. Would they be better without flare? Maybe, but who knows.
If they were in video form you'd have cinematographers drooling...that's perfect video flare. Personally I like the flare, adds a nice element to the grittiness.
OliverO said:
he answer is to just spell it differently - your pictures don't have "flare," they have "flair." ;-)
ha, nice.
 
Upvote 0
This is a great shot. However, the more glass you add the more chance of flare.

You've probably done this already but pull the blacks on the Raw file then export to photoshop and unsharp mask 60% , 2-4 pixels.

This pulls out a lot of flare.
 
Upvote 0
I actually think it's a very good shot. Flare can be used artistically. Tell people that's exactly how you meant to shoot it. One thing to always keep in mind when shooting like that- make sure your front element is CLEAN. Seriously though, I like it.
 
Upvote 0
Mate the shot is great, I would say the flare makes it. Flare isn't always bad
if you can frame the shot right and use the flare to accent a subject or give some added mood to the shot
sometimes those high contrast shots with no flare can look a little flat and lifeless IMO
I really think the flare works well in the shot, It's subtle and doesn't cause a distraction over the subject but provides more of an accent to it
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.