Looking for Tiny Body with WA

Smaler than EOS-M with 11-22mm?

Only the discontinued Nikon 1 series
nikon_3329_1_nikkor_6_7_13mm_f_3_5_5_6_1491588434000_910094.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2011
16,847
1,835
Usually small bodies mean small sensors, which makes ultra wide difficult to find. Apertures tend to be smaller, and when combined with the small sensor, you will have lots of noise above the base ISO.

So, its a trade, and you may not like the end product.

If you don't mind something obsolete, the Samsung NX Mini might work.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00IVEHVR2/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&condition=all
 
Upvote 0
Jul 28, 2015
3,368
570
JumboShrimp said:
Mistaspeedy: Thanks for the Lumix GM5 suggestion - looks promising. Will OM-D lenses fit on a GM5?

Yes. They are part of the micro four-thirds consortium that was set up specifically to ensure compatibility.
I don't recall if the GM5 has in-body stabilisation - most of the Pan lenses have in-lens stabilsation.
All Olympus bodies have in-body stabilisation (IBIS) which means that anything lens below their 40-150 f2.8 does not have lens stabilisation.
So if the GM5 does not have IBIS, then if you put an Olympus lens on a Panasonic body you will have no stabilisation.

You could look at the Panasonic 12-32 lens on the Olympus - and decide if it is small enough on the OM-D.
 
Upvote 0