• UPDATE



    The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being.

    I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe, Canon does deserve the negative criticism, due to this

MonkeyB said:
my default assumption is that all adverts are shot in MF, under the most controlled environment possible, and with maximum PP as believable.

That is probably a good assumption.

But does anyone really buy a lens based solely on an ad? I sure don't and I can't believe that I am unique in this.

The art of advertizing is to push the limits of not quite "lying" about the product.

I would also opine that Canon probably had little visibility into how the ad firm made the ad. Canon only approved the final product.
 
Upvote 0
Upvote 0
oooh, I get it... "a small package", the lens, like the child is relative to the dog/world. Aaaah, punderful!

I was so fixated on the story that I didn't really take in the ad at first. I guess advertising anything else small it would simply be a pun... But they're a camera and lens manufacturer trying to shift lenses, so... Yeah. Canon execs, you silly sausages!
 
Upvote 0