ND Filter for video - how to use?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I shot an interview a while back, and I messed up.

I rented an Arri 3 light kit and set everything up and, wow, it was nice and bright, and for some brain fart of a reason, turned the shutter speed up, and it was strobe and stutter looking.

So, I obtained a 1.8 (10-stop) ND filter.

I don't own the light kit, so... I whipped up this quick test by just leaving the white balance to auto, and messing with just the shutter speed. For video I will want 1/60, but for this test I just ended up at 1/80. I have a small "daylight" fluorescent desk lamp and just shot straight into it.

These are just the raw shots:
No ND Filter
*
ND Filter
*

For these I sampled the red circle area with the white eyedropper in Photoshop Levels:
No ND Filter
*
ND Filter
*

Not too bad really.

In the first batch, within reason, the detail came out close and in the corrected set it was not hard to almost get the white matched up. Not perfect, for for the small amount of work I put into it, pretty close.

What are some production tips I might can use to make this ND filter work? I won't know if 1.8 is too dark until I get the light kit again. I doubt the light kit will be as bright as shooting straight into this desk lamp and I still have aperture and ISO settings to futz with to keep the shutter dialed in at 1/60. I could use a custom white balance. What else?

I use a T2i and a 70-200mm f2.8 L Lens. At some point I will want to use these larger apertures to get that DSLR shallow DoF, so I just left the lens at 2.8 for this test.
 
C

Cornershot

Guest
Not sure what you're saying here. Are you having problems with flicker from the cfl's? The ND filter just allows you to keep your aperture wide open typically when shooting in very bright light like a sunny day. The variable NDs allow you to dial in how much light reduction you need. I've never used the Arri lights so don't know what kind of ballast they use. I've never had flicker issues with Kinos. Just drop your shutter speed.
 
Upvote 0
Y

Yoshiyuki Blade

Guest
I personally like to shoot a neutral reference for WB with the filter on and set it in the camera before recording (I have a WhiBal and it works great). With AWB, daylight looks ok without a filter but there's a cool color cast with filter on. I have a Hoya Pro1-D ND x16 (4 stops) btw. With a neutral reference, both of them look pretty much the same and the colors look great.
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2011
16,848
1,835
I doubt that a lighting kit used indoors will produce anough light to require a ND filter to let you use a lens wide open. It will certainly not be a 10 stop ND filter. ND's come in handy in bright outdoor sunlight to allow you to use a wide aperture and thus achieve shallow depth of field. At ISO 100, you probably will not be able to use f/2.8, even without the ND filter.
 
Upvote 0
I agree with previous poster--if you can, get a variable neutral density filter. This will let you keep the same shutter, aperture and iso (more or less) and only change your neutral density--it feels much the way you would adjust the iris ring on a normal video camera. If it's not too late and you have the funds, i'd say return the one you got and get a variable filter.

If that's not a choice, remember, you don't have to depend solely on the camera/filters to adjust the intensity of light--doing something simple like moving a light forward or back can make a huge light intensity difference--not to mention those kits always come with scrims to cut light output (at least a little). Good luck.
 
Upvote 0
Thanks for the replies.

Yeah, to clarify, I now know to keep the shutter at 1/60, but after I set the lights up, it was too bright and I foolishly upped the shutter speed which introduced the strobing effect. The lights themselves had nothing to do with the strobing.

So, in an effort to make 1/60 work I got this ND filter, which, once I saw it, immediately suspected was going to be too dark, and I have read about the color cast.

In this case it was a small room, so moving the lights back was not an option, though I could have should have used scrims.

I may return this filter (it was $184) and pick up a variable or a couple of filters that are less strong.

Living and learning.

Thanks!
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2011
16,848
1,835
NormanBates said:
check out this:
http://www.similaar.com/foto/tuten/630.html

and this (specially the color cast tests at the end, but also the sharpness issues of the LCW fader ND -and most faders, actually- in case you're considering one of those):
www.similaar.com/foto/lenstests/lenstestsn.html

If renting lights, try to get some that have less light or adjustable output, you do not want to use ND filters except as a last resort.

Filming surfing in Hawaii, you have no control over lighting and must use ND's, but in a studio, you should be able to control the lighting, and dimmer lights are better on everyone.

I still have some 1500 watt tota lights I used in the early days of video camcorders. They fry everything in a small room.
 
Upvote 0
Positron said:
neuroanatomist said:
Your white balance is off because the 10-stop ND filter has a warming effect (my B+W 77mm and Schneider 82mm 10-stoppers do).

That doesn't sound very "neutral" at all! Do all 10-stoppers have that problem? And if so, why?
I haven't used them, but I think it is one of the pitfalls of the high stop ND filters. I've certainly come across similar reports with the Lee Big Stopper.
 
Upvote 0
when you're filtering a lot of light out, all ND filters have some color cast
my cheap tiffen have nearly no cast indoors, but they have some IR issues
http://www.similaar.com/foto/lenstests/lenstestsn.html
(the resolution tests, indoors, show no cast; the outdoor tests go green-ish as I increase filtration and stack glass; as shown there too, it's easily corrected by using custom white balance)

the higher-end tiffen NDs solve part of that issue, but again not all
http://www.hurlbutvisuals.com/blog/2010/02/10/filtration-beware-of-the-reaper-of-cheap-glass/

and they're not extremely expensive, but not cheap either
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004W2NDIS/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=similaar-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B004W2NDIS
 
Upvote 0
Cornershot said:
Actually, all cfl's do flicker or strobe. You can really see it on the cheaper lights and if your power source isn't good or your batteries are low. It also depends on the ballast they use.

These test pics are just my desklamp. I'm not using CFLs otherwise.

For the video I'm using one 650w and two 300w ARRI tungstens.

I'm going to exchange the ND filter for a less powerful one and try to avoid it by using the scrims and a softbox or maybe a 300w fill and scrimmed 300w key or something.

Last shoot was kinda rushed. Trying to plan out how to handle the next one.

I think all these 10 stop one have some sort of cast. The one I got is a nice B+W one, but, it's too much I think.

Avoiding it sound like a nice plan. I don't need to stay at f2.8, but do want some DoF effect.

Thanks, I got some good ideas/knowledge from this thread.
 
Upvote 0
Jul 21, 2010
31,169
13,006
Positron said:
neuroanatomist said:
Your white balance is off because the 10-stop ND filter has a warming effect (my B+W 77mm and Schneider 82mm 10-stoppers do).

That doesn't sound very "neutral" at all! Do all 10-stoppers have that problem? And if so, why?

I think so.

Lee doesn't seem to publish transmission curves, but for the Big Stopper they warn, "Use of the Big Stopper may result in a slight colour cast."

B+W does publish transmission curves (one reason I like them - you know, up front, what you're getting), and it's clear that with the 110 (10-stop) and to a lesser degree with the 106 (6-stop) filter, there's increased transmission in the red area of the spectrum. B+W calls this out in their description of the 106 stating, "Because of its higher transmission in the red beyond 660 nm, this filter brings a slight warm tone to color photographs. If this effect is undesirable, a B+W UV-/IR-Blocking Filter 486 in front of the neutral density filter (not behind it!) remedies that situation." For the 10-stop filter, they indicate that the warm tone is slightly stronger than with the ND 106.

You can see the warmer tone below, top shot is no filter, bottom is the 82mm 10-stop ND from Schneider Optics (parent company of B+W and the only 82mm screw-in 10-stop filter available, AFAIK). As you can see, I use the 10-stop to blur out the people walking through the shot, cars going by, etc.
 

Attachments

  • Trinity-short.jpg
    Trinity-short.jpg
    129.4 KB · Views: 862
  • Trinity-long.jpg
    Trinity-long.jpg
    126.9 KB · Views: 898
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
Positron said:
neuroanatomist said:
Your white balance is off because the 10-stop ND filter has a warming effect (my B+W 77mm and Schneider 82mm 10-stoppers do).

That doesn't sound very "neutral" at all! Do all 10-stoppers have that problem? And if so, why?

I think so.

Lee doesn't seem to publish transmission curves, but for the Big Stopper they warn, "Use of the Big Stopper may result in a slight colour cast."

B+W does publish transmission curves (one reason I like them - you know, up front, what you're getting), and it's clear that with the 110 (10-stop) and to a lesser degree with the 106 (6-stop) filter, there's increased transmission in the red area of the spectrum. B+W calls this out in their description of the 106 stating, "Because of its higher transmission in the red beyond 660 nm, this filter brings a slight warm tone to color photographs. If this effect is undesirable, a B+W UV-/IR-Blocking Filter 486 in front of the neutral density filter (not behind it!) remedies that situation." For the 10-stop filter, they indicate that the warm tone is slightly stronger than with the ND 106.

You can see the warmer tone below, top shot is no filter, bottom is the 82mm 10-stop ND from Schneider Optics (parent company of B+W and the only 82mm screw-in 10-stop filter available, AFAIK). As you can see, I use the 10-stop to blur out the people walking through the shot, cars going by, etc.

That's actually pretty dramatic, but since it's very even across the frame I'd assume it can be pretty much completely corrected with a white balance adjustment. Personally, I actually like the colors on the bottom image more, but that's not the point. Did you use manual WB for those? I feel like auto would have picked up on such a large color shift.
 
Upvote 0
Jul 21, 2010
31,169
13,006
Positron said:
That's actually pretty dramatic, but since it's very even across the frame I'd assume it can be pretty much completely corrected with a white balance adjustment. Personally, I actually like the colors on the bottom image more, but that's not the point. Did you use manual WB for those? I feel like auto would have picked up on such a large color shift.

Actually, it was Auto WB (which I typically shoot because I always shoot RAW). But the difference in the camera-selected WB is minor - the no-filter shot was 5034 K and 0 tint, and the 10-stop ND shot was 4996 K and +4 tint. Setting them alike doesn't change the differential, although you are correct in that it could be corrected with a WB adustment. But in this case, I completely agree...I prefer the warmer tone anyway!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.