I have the RF 24-105 f4-7.1 and was wondering what lens or lenses( in order ) any of you would recommend I get next. Go EF adapted or save for RF? I shoot mostly landscapes and birds with some sports and macro sometimes.
So 35 1.8 then 100-400. Should I wait for the RF version or adapt the EF version?I got RF 35mm f/1.8 macro after Rf 24-105 f/4L. Wanted to try something little lighter/shorter and faster but your 24-105 is probably not too heavy/big .
I choose 35mm over 85 macro cause i dont do portraits and could do some landscapes/star shots with it. Not too happy with coma for stars so far , still get some at 2.8 so i could just shoot my 24-105 at f/4. Not sure if its normal for most lenses at 2.8 like this or im too picky and dream of no coma.
Macro is fun, at 0.5X if you want to fill frame maybe 2 inches subject without crop. Expect to crop if you focus stack automatically.
Next i will look for RF 100-500 for wildlife and landscapes and wait for more macro coming.
If you are on budget, a RF 100-400 non L is rumored for this year should be much cheaper than 100-500 right now and of course most EF lenses are good and you can find used.
The RF 100-500 would be good for your landscapes/birds/sports and can be used for some medium macro like butterflies/dragons/probably big flowers or mushrooms too. Not sure what you like to macro. But it cost alot
So 35 1.8 then 100-400. Should I wait for the RF version or adapt the EF version?
So 35 1.8 then 100-400. Should I wait for the RF version or adapt the EF version?
So 35 1.8 then 100-400. Should I wait for the RF version or adapt the EF version?