If EOS-M users theoretically got to choose exactly 2 lenses to add to the native EF-M lineup, which ones would make the cut?
NorbR said:I picked 50mm and 85mm.
The system needs primes.
Anything would be an addition, right Neuro? It's a system, right?neuroanatomist said:Compact short tele primes would be a very welcome addition.
dppaskewitz said:Something like a 30 to 32mm fast pancake. (I'm trying for a 50mm equivalent, if I did the math right)? The point being to having a "normal" range walk around lens that would take advantage of the diminutive system.
Tinky said:28mm is roughly a standard lens on aps-c, equivalent to mid forties, the diagonal of 135 film.
NorbR said:I picked 50mm and 85mm.
The system needs primes. Small, fast primes. It has the zooms it needs, mostly pretty good albeit slow zooms. f/2.8 zooms don't really belong to the M system, at least not as a priority. Big lenses on small cameras don't make much sense.
If I had 3 choices I'd have picked a macro as well. I don't do much of it so it didn't make the cut for me, but it would certainly be a nice addition to the system.
Bernard said:Other than that, the system needs a better 18-55. Mine isn't tack sharp when compared to the 22 and to adapted full-frame primes. Has anyone else noticed this, or do I have a dud? It's good enough for snapshots, but not for real prints.