Post Your Shots That "Could Have Been"

Bert63

What’s in da box?
CR Pro
Dec 3, 2017
1,021
2,247
Except for the fact that I chopped his wings off, this would have been a decent shot.

BNV25488 DxO.jpg
 

Bert63

What’s in da box?
CR Pro
Dec 3, 2017
1,021
2,247
I think we all are. They are such amazing and fast flying creatures. With a long lens it is hard to keep them in frame.


Oh I don't limit myself to moving targets. I'm equally good at chopping the feet off stationary ones as well. Granted, I was timing the fly-by and joust, but you'd think I could have been aware enough to include a set of feet or a perch for the heron.

Oh no.

BNV20339 DxO.jpg
 

SteveC

R5
CR Pro
Sep 3, 2019
2,054
1,913
Oh I don't limit myself to moving targets. I'm equally good at chopping the feet off stationary ones as well. Granted, I was timing the fly-by and joust, but you'd think I could have been aware enough to include a set of feet or a perch for the heron.

Oh no.

View attachment 189516

At least you didn't cause telephone poles to sprout from their heads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert63

ISv

"The equipment that matters, is you"
CR Pro
Apr 30, 2017
1,213
2,332
Oh I don't limit myself to moving targets. I'm equally good at chopping the feet off stationary ones as well. Granted, I was timing the fly-by and joust, but you'd think I could have been aware enough to include a set of feet or a perch for the heron.

Oh no.

View attachment 189516

Huh: tell me! Sometimes I'm lucky to see at least the head (in the second photo I had no choice: it's in preserved area and you go only on the marked paths, there was no angle to see the entire bird). BTW I understand what Steve means with this new topic but it's not the only the way you can miss a good photo.



DSC_5760_DxO_DxO-1.jpg
DSC_9341_DxO.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert63 and Cog
<-- start Taboola -->