Here: https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/t...s-ef-100-400mm-ii-vs-400mm-do-ii-on-r5.39813/Can anyone please point me in the right direction? I want to compare the RF 100-500 at 500 f7.1 to the EF 100-400 1.4tc at 560 f5.6.
Your help will be much appreciated.
Thank you very much. Will search again. Think my keywords must have been too vague!!!Here: https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/t...s-ef-100-400mm-ii-vs-400mm-do-ii-on-r5.39813/
It's worthwhile doing a CR search of Titles.
This is the only comparison I have seen. The 5DSR has very similar resolution to the R5 so it's a fair comparison. https://www.the-digital-picture.com...meraComp=979&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=5&APIComp=0Now I realise my error! I wrote 100-400 1.4. I meant 200-400 F4.0 with built in 1.4 tc at 560mm F5.6. My apologies!!!
I do have a 100-500, but it is usually on my girlfriends camera! Think I will rent the 200-400 this weekend and compare for myself.Comparison: $8,300 more expensive, twice the weight and just under a stop faster. If the cost and weight don't matter to you, then buy the 200-400. For most people, the cost and weight do matter.
Sold the 400 and 600 this week. And lost quite a bit of money. So decided that I am going to try and live with the Tamron 150-600 G2 as a stopgap till the rumored 200-500 f4(with tc?) is released, hopefully next year. That way I wont lose a lot of money again. I had a 400 F4.0 DO II that I sold to finance the 400 F2.8 III. I never should have done it, realised it was my favourite lens, but too late!!!!Remember to tell what you see afterwards. Have a nice one.