Rumored Canon EOS M6 Mark II specifications [CR1]
- Thread starter Canon Rumors Guy
- Start date
Why? Their camera’s still work fine right?
I must’ve missed the full frame sensor in the M5/6 II spec list, would you mind highlighting it for me? Thanks!
IS works with a Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 AF 2.0X DGX on my Canon bodies that were around when I bought the TC. It's inconsistent with bodies much newer than the TC. In general, AFMA has to be disabled to prevent the camera from locking up when the TC is attached and the shutter is released on bodies from late 2014 and newer. In this situation, IS may or may not be working - I haven't investigated the possibility of whether IS is working or not because the loss of AFMA at such long focal lengths is enough for me to eliminate the possibility of using it with those bodies.
I don't see how in the world not getting an RF mount camera leaves anyone in the dust.
Yes, that’s because RF not as well dust sealed vs 1 DX series. So if you Indeed expected to shoot in a dusty environment, then hold on to your trusty 1/5 series Canon DSLR.I don't see how in the world not getting an RF mount camera leaves anyone in the dust.
I did try the EOS R, and while it's a great little camera, it did take some getting used to. Have to reprogram that muscle memory. I'm not sure I'd be comfortable replacing my 5D iv with it yet, one because I'm not familiar enough with it yet, but two because the 5D iv does have some features that the R does not. If I break my 5D I'd probably look at the R as a cheaper replacement.
I'm not sure being left in the dust is a real risk in this transition though. DSLRs continue to work, and I think you can categorize the key benefits of mirrorless as several features which increase the likelihood of getting a shot. They all increase odds of success, to some extent, by providing features which help the shooter perform quickly and accurately. That can be a big help for some types of photography, but when your niche requires slow and thoughtful action, those mirrorless features don't add so much to success. I don't find myself missing a lot of shots because I can't keep focus or I'm getting my exposure wrong, or I can't see the screen, or I can't react fast enough. For people like me, mirrorless doesn't seem to add that much.
Yes, mirrorless comes with some great new features and technology, but it doesn't make the image for you, and it doesn't ease the process for some types of photography. For now, I prefer the optical viewfinder and haven't seen the need in my photography for those key features.
Last edited:
I think this would be a great firmware update request. With RF lenses and modern bodies it should be straight forward to set a "Focus to Infinity" setting as a programmable button or mode. The camera already knows settings for the lenses for focus speed, distortions, etc, this would just be another setting.
Hahaha yes that wasn’t my point and we all agree to say that taking nice pictures and skills don’t depend on your gear. I meant mirrorless is what manufacturers are doing now and I doubt that Canon will let Sony and Fuji take the lead as DSLR sales dropped by 60% in the past year and represent now less than a third of te market and going down.
Well I think any reasonable company that is making business is not going where the market is not going
DSLR is less than a third of the market now and quickly dying. So no, I don’t think we will see many new DSLR cameras in the future, and yes Canon might be the only one to do so to make a few niche sales with DSLR fanboys.Look at this chart as a CEO and tell me what focus you give to your R&D department?
unfocused
EOS-1D X Mark III
There seems to be a very big and questionable footnote to your evidence:Well I think any reasonable company that is making business is not going where the market is not going
Look at this chart as a CEO and tell me what focus you give to your R&D department?
View attachment 185835
I'd like to see figures from an independent third party.
You are supposed to be Dilbert-type CEO and not to pay attention to such minuscule details
Really, Based on a "SONY Survey" NOT real industry sales or manufacturing data. Trolls will believe anything!Well I think any reasonable company that is making business is not going where the market is not going
Look at this chart as a CEO and tell me what focus you give to your R&D department?
View attachment 185835
Not true. Trolls only believe what they want to believe.
I don't think you can draw any conclusions from what trolls believe from what they say, similar to politicians, they say what they need/want with the intention of getting the reaction they want, belief doesn't come into it.
Interesting. If someone sincerely believes something does that mean they are not a troll?
I don't think you can draw that conclusion either.
I think people with misplaced but sincere beliefs could appear to be trolls, but I'd expect those types to be able to back up their claims/beliefs with actual images or data that support those beliefs/claims thereby giving their emotional attachment a basis in (their) reality. In my experience when they do present data or images it is relatively easy to illustrate that it does not show what they think it does and they go back to wherever they came from.
On the other hand trolls don't present anything of even cursory value and just think the louder they shout or the more reaction they get the more impressive their message is, in my experience their only belief is noise = good, reaction = even better, noisy reaction = nirvana.
Similar threads
- Contains 1 staff post(s)
- Contains 1 staff post(s)
- Contains 1 staff post(s)
- Contains 1 staff post(s)
<-- start Taboola -->