• UPDATE



    The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being.

    I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

someone identify this crazy video attachment/camera?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nov 10, 2010
29
0
4,826
so my mate was out at some festival here in sydney australia and he saw this camera man filming someone for an interview or something. it seemed he was using a full on pro video camera, but on closer look, it looks like a canon camera with some sort of crazy attachment!








Sorry about the pics, but they were from an iphone, but could someone shed some light on this crazy contraption??

thanks

edit: Updated pics to full res iphone4 images!
 
It appears to be a digital camera prototype from the late 80's or something , looks like it might have a built in Satalte communication system to tranfer the massive 200x300 resolution images directly to one's home computer connected to a 14.4 modem :)
 
Upvote 0
Pro cam op here, That body looks like a Sony, but I don't know for sure as it looks like nothing I have ever seen. The strap and the cover on top of the buttons on the top are a dead give away, the handle looks very sony too. Canon lens on the front but cant really tell which one. The monitor on the side? Probably not a sat link, looks like its integrated into the camera body so really don't know, probably just a monitor.
 
Upvote 0
I have enlarged the picture in Photoshop.
It seems authentic and...

For sure this is a DSLR (one series camera), but I don't know what the brick on his shoulders is.

However meaby, just meaby the 'brick' on his shoulders is to camouflage the new camera... 8)


EDIT: Its a small body camera (not a 1 as I initially thought).
Still clear that the 'video thing' acts as a decoy to mislead people to think its a photo/videocamera.
 
Upvote 0
OK Guys... first post here, though I've been lurking several years.

That "camera" is definitely a disguise. The monitor looks carved out of clay or some synthetic material - it's just a shell. Check out the outputs below - another shell - nothing workable there.

So they must be hiding something within that shell. Maybe testing their Nov. 3 pro cam while in disguise?

In the words of my old friend Arte Johnson - Veerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry Interesting. (but stupid - I think not).
 
Upvote 0
Just checked with head office and its the new "video enhanced" 5Diii. They thought about releasing two 5Diii cameras. One with a video emphasis. Another which was a cheaper FF. But they thought that marketing and naming issues (3D, 7Dii ??) were too much of a headache. Problem solved with a video unit attachment. You just plug it and away you go. Plus this gives you extended battery power, satellite uplink, wifi, and more memory with inbuilt, hot swapable, 2TB HDD.

The model above is fitted with the new 24-70/2.8 IS.
 
Upvote 0
It look likehe is attaching a Canon DSLR with video function (5D II ??)To a old Sony camcorder ( It actually show model as TRV ???/) without the lens. It look like he is using the old camcorder for the following: 1. as a shoulder support to help the hoding for video. 2. the microphone from the camcorder. 3. The eye level monitor of the ccmcorder. 3. The large battery of the camcorder to power the DSLR for extender recording.
 
Upvote 0
It's a frankencamera.

That isn't a 5D2, a 1D4 or a 1DS3, promise. Firstly the grip on the base is missing and it's not a 5D2 as there is no knob on top where one should be. It certainly looks like a 1 series camera but the lack of the aforementioned grip on the base says it isn't.

Also, at the front of the camera the rubber that covers the USB ports doesn't match any of the above (I have all of them to compare).

The absence of a control dial suggests it is a 1 series but the lack of battery compartment at the base makes it most interesting as all 1 series cameras had the same shape.
 
Upvote 0
wockawocka said:
It's a frankencamera.

That isn't a 5D2, a 1D4 or a 1DS3, promise. Firstly the grip on the base is missing and it's not a 5D2 as there is no knob on top where one should be. It certainly looks like a 1 series camera but the lack of the aforementioned grip on the base says it isn't.

Also, at the front of the camera the rubber that covers the USB ports doesn't match any of the above (I have all of them to compare).

The absence of a control dial suggests it is a 1 series but the lack of battery compartment at the base makes it most interesting as all 1 series cameras had the same shape.


I am not so sure, I do think there is a dial on top of that camera. But its hard to distinguish from the background. Have we identified the lens.

My initial thought was that this was a 15-35mm but it isn't. Also it isn't a 24-70.
However I do not own a 24-105, so meaby its just that lens.
 
Upvote 0
Enlarged 2 of the pics... in PS.

Looks like a 5d type body form. The head holder/bracket makes it seem like a 1d body but it is not that deep like a 1d. The model number is sharpied out so this is definitely in disguise!
 

Attachments

  • 5d3-maybe2.jpg
    5d3-maybe2.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 1,738
  • 5d3-maybe.jpg
    5d3-maybe.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 2,224
Upvote 0
The lens hood looks like the hood from the TS-E 24mm 3.5 II:
On-Camera-1.jpg


And to me the lens appears to be something like the 24-105.
 
Upvote 0
That 3rd picture clearly shows an inked out "Mark [something]" insignia below the lens release, but this is definitely not a 1-series camera...just look at any pictures of a 1-series body and you can rule it out. It looks similar to a 5D Mark II, but it's different...slightly different body shape. This is probably a 5D Mark III. Considering the ridiculous disguise, it's likely a prototype or pre-release tester that they want to keep under the radar. The big over-the-shoulder body could certainly be hiding an external video recording module (though it'd probably be a fraction of the size). Or this is an old-shcool ENG guy with a 5d Mark II, and he modified his old OTS camera instead of dropping a grand on a Zacuto rig hahaha.
If Canon were nice, they'd put out an awesome 5D III and sell an external video module to enable RAW or better-than-line-skipped-1080 video for those of us who want to shoot HQ full frame video. That's if they were nice. They seem to make a lot more money by just doling out periodic upgrades and dribbling out pre-existing technology
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.