There will be an EOS M/EF-M announcement this year [CR1]

Feb 16, 2021
6
2
For me the M6 mark II is the perfect camera body. The size of the body and lenses makes me carry it everywhere (something I did not want do with my 7D). With 22, 32 and 56mm primes the image quality is outstanding. To make things perfect I'd need only these sony mount lenses for the ef-m mount too:

Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD​

Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD​

Maybe also a compact ef-m 11-16mm f/3.5 or f/2.8?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanielK
Feb 16, 2021
6
2
I still hope for a bright future of the EF-M mount. I love to carry the M6II with me and I still hope for an M5MkII - with 8stop IBIS - and some more lenses.... especially a 100-400, a 56 f1.4 (But I can live with the Sigma....) as well as a 64nn f2.8 macro with 1:1 magnification amd some light....
I agree, specially with the need for tele zoom. However no need for Canon 56mm as the Sigma prime is perfect, it's my favorite of all the ef-m lenses (I'have the great Canon 22 f/2 and 32 f/1.4 lenses too).
 

SteveC

R5
CR Pro
Sep 3, 2019
2,478
2,340
I agree, specially with the need for tele zoom. However no need for Canon 56mm as the Sigma prime is perfect, it's my favorite of all the ef-m lenses (I'have the great Canon 22 f/2 and 32 f/1.4 lenses too).

Telezoom--at least a native telezoom--cannot happen so long as Canon insists on a 61mm maxium outside diameter.

I did buy the native Tamron 18-200mm, but it's noticeably fatter than 61mm. However, it practically lives on my M6-II. I did swap it for the 32mm prime the other day--for a while.
 
Feb 16, 2021
6
2
Telezoom--at least a native telezoom--cannot happen so long as Canon insists on a 61mm maxium outside diameter.

I did buy the native Tamron 18-200mm, but it's noticeably fatter than 61mm. However, it practically lives on my M6-II. I did swap it for the 32mm prime the other day--for a while.
I did not even know Canon has a design principle of 61mm maximum diameter but it does seem like that looking at the lenses. Sticking to a specific diameter and still making zillions of filter sizes and lens hood sizes does not look so smart to me. I'd appreciate a lot more if the filters and lens hoods were interchangeable like in the Tamron series for the Sony M mount.

I really don't care if it is Sigma or Tamron making the ef-m lenses as long as someone supplies us with good semi-compact lens options at reasonable prices.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Navyo Eller

SteveC

R5
CR Pro
Sep 3, 2019
2,478
2,340
I did not even know Canon has a design principle of 61mm maximum diameter but it does seem like that looking at the lenses. Sticking to a specific diameter and still making zillions of filter sizes and lens hood sizes does not look so smart to me. I'd appreciate a lot more if the filters and lens hoods were interchangeable like in the Tamron series for the Sony M mount.

I really don't care if it is Sigma or Tamron making the ef-m lenses as long as someone supplies us with good semi-compact lens options at reasonable prices.
You might want to look at that Tamron then.

As far as the differing filter diameter, the suggestion I got was to use step up rings and leave them permanently attached to the lenses with the smaller filter diameters, so that you can still standardize. That won't help you with hood sizes though.