This is Canon’s RF lens roadmap going forward

Canon Rumors Guy

EOS-1D X Mark III
CR Pro
Jul 20, 2010
8,507
1,229
Canada
www.canonrumors.com
Last month I reported on Canon’s lens roadmap for the remainder of 2020 and likely into 2022. That report included the RF 50mm f/1.8 STM and the RF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM, and descriptions of the lenses that turned out to be correct.
I still get a lot of questions about the roadmap going forward, so I figured I’d post a reminder about what to expect and add this information to the menu on the left so you can come back to it easily.
Canon RF Tilt-Shift Lenses:

Canon TS-R 14mm f/4L
Canon TS-R 24mm f/3.5L

These lenses will be the first tilt-shift lenses to have autofocus.
Canon RF Zoom Lenses:

Canon RF 10-24mm f/4L USM
Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM
Canon RF 18-45mm f/4-5.6...
Continue reading...
 
Last edited:

IcyBergs

I have a Sony...TV
May 31, 2016
127
268
Most anticipated of this list for me would be the 14-35 f4 IS.

Biggest question in my mind is price and color of the 100-400 with the 7.1 at the long end, I think it's reasonable to debate whether or not that'll be a "L" lens. Either way though I'd hope to see a modest price tag.
 
Last edited:

Jstnelson

EOS R5
Feb 21, 2020
32
91
It's a little disappointing to me that they aren't planning on releasing a 24 1.4 any time soon...this would be the perfect lens in RF mount!
Same here. I’m hoping there are a couple lenses on the list that just haven’t leaked yet. I think canon will release something like a 20mm 1.8 or 24mm 1.4 soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Del Paso

VICYASA

EOS M6 Mark II
Dec 15, 2019
61
57
Can someone explain to the
  • Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro
What would this lens be best used for and what types of shot will this lens be effective for? Portraits up close? Landscape? Macro of flowers and bugs? Please help. want to learn about lenses and uses and how this in future could be paired with r5 camera.Thanks
 

edoorn

EOS RP
Apr 1, 2016
335
300
Dissapointed that they don't plan an 85mm 1.4. 85mm f2 doesn't seem as sharp and 1.2 is too expensive, loud and large :/
I don't know where you have that information from, but the 85 F/2 is very sharp wide open (in fact, about as sharp as the 85 EF 1.4 at f/2; I did a test since I have both of these lenses).

There's always room for an RF 1.4 version of course but I can imagine that for now they spend their resources and address other focal lengths.
 

SUNDOG04

EOS M6 Mark II
CR Pro
Mar 1, 2015
99
34
Still holding out hope for a 24-70F4 L IS!

-Brian
Me too. I prefer landscape and outdoors photography. An f2.8 is too expensive, and I don’t need the weight. Had I been in the mirrorless market right now, I would be getting a Z6 II as that with the Nikkor S f4 is just $100 more than just the R6 body. Of course many other considerations.
 

privatebydesign

Garfield is back...
CR Pro
Jan 29, 2011
9,188
3,410
120
The 1200mm f8 is interesting, I wonder what, if anything, it will offer over the 600 f4 and tc? I’d expect it to be a very hard sell given its price which I would estimate to be close to breaking the $20,000 barrier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fox40phil

Marximusprime

EOS M50
Sep 18, 2018
28
37
I like the idea of the 24 1.8. I'll probably buy that and sell the 35, because in crop mode on the R5 that'll give me about 38mm.
 

bbasiaga

Canon Shooter
Nov 15, 2011
368
362
USA
Me too. I prefer landscape and outdoors photography. An f2.8 is too expensive, and I don’t need the weight. Had I been in the mirrorless market right now, I would be getting a Z6 II as that with the Nikkor S f4 is just $100 more than just the R6 body. Of course many other considerations.
The EF 24-70f4L IS is still pretty compact and affordable even with the adapter. So there is always that to fall back on if they wait a while to put out an RF version. Although the 24-104 F4 L RF lens is pretty small and well reviewed. So we have options, which is good.

-Brian
 

mccasi

EOS M50
Oct 24, 2019
38
54
I'll say it again, we need some wide astro love! R5 is sooo good for low light... Canon teased with 14-21 F1.4 and 14-28 F2...
I don't like the Sigma 14mm F1.8, for bad coma and too narrow use case... Canon to the rescue!!!
 

privatebydesign

Garfield is back...
CR Pro
Jan 29, 2011
9,188
3,410
120
It can take 1.4x or 2.0x teleconverter. ;)
The biggest issue I have had with extreme telephotos has been atmospheric interference. It isn’t that difficult to get crazy magnification, you can stack EF TC’s if not RF TC’s, but getting clear enough air between you and the subject can be impossibly difficult.