Three new Canon lenses appear for certification

[Canon Rumors]

Three new Canon lenses have appeared in Russia for certification according to Nokishita. At this time, I do not know what these three lenses are.
Below are the latest three lenses that have appeared for certification.

4857C005 – Canon RF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM Macro
5053C005-  Canon RF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM
5054C005 – Canon RF 600mm f/4L IS USM

In a normal world, once lenses reach this stage, they tend to be announced within a few months. Things could obviously be different this year.
I haven’t updated the Canon RF lens roadmap in a while, but you can...

Continue reading...

 

[SereneSpeed]

The attached image says 100-500 f4.5-7.1 L IS USM...

Is that image related, or just filler?

 

[neurorx]

Crossing my fingers on 135 f1.4!!

 

[jolyonralph]

The attached image says 100-500 f4.5-7.1 L IS USM...

Is that image related, or just filler?

Well seeing as that lens has been out for a while, I guess we can say unrelated.

 

[Canon Rumors]

The attached image says 100-500 f4.5-7.1 L IS USM...

Is that image related, or just filler?

It's unrelated. The RF 100-500mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM has the model number 4112C002

 

[HikeBike]

Placing my bets:
- Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro
- Canon RF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
- Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM

 

[trulandphoto]

Placing my bets:
- Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 IS STM Macro
- Canon RF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
- Canon RF 14-35mm f/4L IS USM

I'm going to take a wild guess that the two consecutively numbered lenses are the two TS-R lenses. No reasoning, just a thought.

Well, maybe a little reasoning. The similar numbers and as relatively low volume lenses they won't over tax supply chains but would be upscale.

 

[another_mikey]

Hoping for that 14-35 F/4L IS as one of these!

ML

 

[Canfan]

Would be nice to be able to adapt the sony 200-600mm to My R5.

 

[JohnC]

Not sure if this has been reported here but I saw mention of this elsewhere that indicates the 100 macro, 400/2.8 and 600/4

https://twitter.com/x/status/1378260109722152964

 

[blackcoffee17]

Not sure if this has been reported here but I saw mention of this elsewhere that indicates the 100 macro, 400/2.8 and 600/4

https://twitter.com/x/status/1378260109722152964

Logical choices as all three lenses are essential in a system.

 

[padam]

I wonder if the reason why the 400 and 600 were the first to come out because they are just conversions from the EF-mount version III lenses, those already have fly-by-wire manual focusing.

 

[trulandphoto]

I'm going to take a wild guess that the two consecutively numbered lenses are the two TS-R lenses. No reasoning, just a thought.

Well, maybe a little reasoning. The similar numbers and as relatively low volume lenses they won't over tax supply chains but would be upscale.

Shows what I know.