ronderick said:A 200-400 f/4 zoom like the Nikon one will be nice... maybe stick in a DO if it doesn't affect the quality too much - that might cut some weight off the potential monster.
Well, things would like nice as long as we don't ask about the price :
nzmargolies said:I would love a 2.8 version of the 24-105. that is the perfect range to complement the 16-35, and i refuse to buy anything slower than 2.8. I love my shallow DOF
that1guy said:^I could get on board with this! ;D I love my 24-105 but the 2.8 would make it even better. Of course it would be huge, but I don't care. I believe Tamron made one of these (maybe it was a 28-105 2.8...does anyone remember?) at one point.