Canon EOS R

Full-resolution sample images from the EOS R5, EOS R6, and the new lenses

A member of the Fred Miranda Forums did some digging on Canon Japan’s web site and dug up full resolution sample images from the Canon EOS R5, Canon EOS R6, and all of the new lenses.

The sample images are a mix of shots using the Canon EOS R5, Canon EOS R6, RF 600mm f/11 IS STM, RF 800mm f/11 IS STM and the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM along with current RF lenses such as the RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM and others.

Canon EOS R5 Sample Images:

Lens: Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM

Camera Settings: Aperture Priority, 57mm, 1/8 second, f/8, ISO 100, Exp Comp -2/3


Lens: Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM

Camera Settings: Manual, 363mm, 1/2000 second, f/7.1, ISO 800


Lens: Canon RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Camera Settings: Aperture Priority, 111mm, 1/5000 second, f/2.8, ISO 125, Exp Comp -1


Lens: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Camera Settings: Manual, 53mm, 2 seconds, f/11, ISO 800


Lens: Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM

Camera Settings: Aperture Priority, 100mm, 1/1000 second, f/6.3, ISO 200, Exp Comp -1/3


Lens: Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM

Camera Settings: Manual, 100mm, 1/3200 second, f/8, ISO 250


Canon EOS R6 Sample Images

Lens: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Camera Settings: Manual, 105mm, 1/30 second, f/4, ISO 102400


Lens: Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM

Camera Settings: Aperture Priority, 46mm, 1/500 second, f/5.6, ISO 100, Exp Comp -2/3


Lens: Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM

Camera Settings: Manual, 324mm, 1/3200 second, f/7.1, ISO 1600


Lens: Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM

Camera Settings: Manual, 400mm, 1/2000 second, f/6.3, ISO 400


Lens: CanonRF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM

Camera Settings: Aperture Priority, 1/80 second, f/2, ISO 400, Exp Comp +1 2/3


Lens: Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Camera Settings: Manual, 24mm, 20 seconds, f/4, ISO 200


Canon RF 600mm f/11 IS STM Sample Images

Camera: Canon EOS R

Camera Settings: Manual, 1/250 second, f/11, ISO 100


Camera: Canon EOS R

Camera Settings: Aperture Priority, 1/800 second, f/11, ISO 400, Exp Comp -1/3


Canon RF 800mm f/11 IS STM Sample Images

Camera: Canon EOS R

Camera Settings: Manual, 1/125 second, f/11, ISO 1600


Camera: Canon EOS R

Camera Settings: Manual, 1/320 second, f/11, ISO 1600


Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM Sample Images

Camera: Canon EOS R5

Camera Settings: Manual, 270mm, 1/5000 second, f/7.1, ISO 1600


Camera: Canon EOS R5

Camera Settings: Aperture Priority, 100mm, 1/250 second, f/4.5, ISO 100, Exp Comp +1


Camera: Canon EOS R5

Camera Settings: Manual, 500mm, 1/2000 second, f/7.1, ISO 800

*Note: These images were compressed and some converted from .webp to .jpg for server purposes. You can view the original images at the FredMiranda forum.

6degrees

RF 85mm F1.2
Sep 6, 2018
120
80
I would like to see how DXOMark rank RF85 F1.2, etc., on R5, especially comparing to Otus lenses.
 

ahsanford

Particular Member
Aug 16, 2012
8,616
1,627
He wrote on the Dpreview forum that he started some measurements. He said he got the exactly same read noise as the 1DXmarkIII

This is going to be such a nice bump in dynamic range over my 5D3 -- can't wait to see how it comes out, but this is a rough idea of what we'll find:

1595514762935.png


- A
 
  • Like
Reactions: fox40phil

Colorado

EOS M6 Mark II
Dec 16, 2013
53
151
For those that don't read the fred miranda forums as soon as these images were posted they decided most of them were crap. Not because of the hardware--though they weren't big fans of the 600/800mm lenses--but because they thought there were tons of photographer errors. To the point that they wondered if Canon specifically hired people to take the worst photos possible for samples.

Just curious what the CR crowd evaluation is.
 

koenkooi

EOS R
CR Pro
Feb 25, 2015
1,328
1,117
For those that don't read the fred miranda forums as soon as these images were posted they decided most of them were crap. Not because of the hardware--though they weren't big fans of the 600/800mm lenses--but because they thought there were tons of photographer errors. To the point that they wondered if Canon specifically hired people to take the worst photos possible for samples.

Just curious what the CR crowd evaluation is.
Canon is quite (in)famous for having the most crappy sample pictures, so it isn't really surprising that people would say it about these as well.
 

Sharlin

EOS R
CR Pro
Dec 26, 2015
1,327
1,097
Turku, Finland
Did anyone actually say that?

It's a fact that a blurred background requires more separation at f/11 than say, f/2.8, but it's also a fact that if you can get the separation, you'll get blur.
I think the point was that some people may have underestimated how much the focal length matters. At 600mm or 800mm you're going to get blurred backgrounds no matter what. A 800mm f/2.8 would be a sight to behold, btw ;)
 

koenkooi

EOS R
CR Pro
Feb 25, 2015
1,328
1,117
I think the point was that some people may have underestimated how much the focal length matters. At 600mm or 800mm you're going to get blurred backgrounds no matter what. A 800mm f/2.8 would be a sight to behold, btw ;)
Does it come equipped with its own truck?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RMac and Sharlin

StevenA

EOS M6 Mark II
CR Pro
Jul 8, 2020
79
154
REALLY excited for these bodies and lenses. I went with the R5 kit with the 24-105 and the 100-500 on release day. Just ordered the 15-35 yesterday. I sold my 5dmiv a couple days ago and didn't even weep putting it in the mail. Although I am completely camera-less at the moment and only have the EF 16-35 iii to look at and hold, but it's up for sale also.

I'm all in on the new system and I couldn't be happier, and I don't think I will be disappointed either. :D

Those samples of the 100-500 are so sweet. Too bad that lens isn't slated for release until the end of September. :(