Here is the Canon Cinema EOS C70

287 comments

1. Canon says "Game On!"

   • Reply

   • 0
2. Yeeeeeeaaaaaaaahhhh BABY!!!!

   • Reply

   • 0
3. Like a black magic meets a zCam thing. Love it

   • Reply

   • 0
4. There's your video camera, boys.

   • Reply

   • 0
5. So you already know what’s what Craig, but Im gonna speculate for the sheer fun. Blackmagic looking body so it has a rear Touch screen built in for DPAF2 touch and menus. Does NOT look to have built in EVF but I expected as much. No problem.

   • Reply

   • 0
6. Looks like two xlr, or mini xlr, inputs on the side and a hdmi output. No sdi. Cold shoe on top. Hope they release some accessories for the cold shoe.

   • Reply

   • 0
7. Do we know any specs yet?

   • Reply

   • 0

8. There's your video camera, boys.

   I hope so. Hopefully this will move the story along. R5 + this ( depending on specs) + C300/C500 type cine cam would be a dream, boiiiii.

   • Reply

   • 0
9. EOSHD is doomed.

   • Reply

   • 0
10. I like how reserved CRGuy is on this one. Being very careful with the details. I like it. Excited for Canon. Feel that they're a bit more ambitious now than the last few years due to soooo much competition across the board.

    • Reply

    • 0

11. Continue reading...

    I wonder if that is what they would have to have done to the R5 to run continuous 8k?

    • Reply

    • 0
12. I fully expect that thing to run 12k unlimited recording (based on youtuber expectations) ;)

    • Reply

    • 0
13. It's the 1DC Mark II :love: .....If that handgrip is built in 1d-style then it better:
    
    1. Takes stills (perhaps a mirrorless 1dx III built in?)
    2. Have a swivel screen (or titling at minimum)
    
    If so it'll be a gauntlet through-down for a video/stills hybrid. Which would make sense that it moved from the stills to Cinema line, as the necessary venting and button layout is dictated more by video need than photo.
    
    However, it doesn't look like there's an EVF....which puts a serious damper on any possible stills capability. So if this is only video capable, I'm a bit bummed they just didn't shrink down the C100 body 20% or so....that EVF + removal side grip + swivel/tilt screen is such a versatile package.

    • Reply

    • 0
14. I can’t fully tell, but it just might look hideous. In any case it’s not so much about the looks as the specs. I’m liking the Eos R5 more that the overheat nonsense has been relaxed. Granted I believe Canon could do better as the camera really does not overheat.
    I’m wondering if this is the body that is supposed to have the C300 Mk3 sensor?

    • Reply

    • 0
15. this is all i wanted. Also the ronin s 2 is coming.

    • Reply

    • 0

16. It's the 1DC Mark II :love: .....If that handgrip is built in 1d-style then it better:
    
    1. Takes stills (perhaps a mirrorless 1dx III built in?)
    2. Have a swivel screen (or titling at minimum)
    
    If so it'll be a gauntlet through-down for a video/stills hybrid. Which would make sense that it moved from the stills to Cinema line, as the necessary venting and button layout is dictated more by video need than photo.
    
    However, it doesn't look like there's an EVF....which puts a serious damper on any possible stills capability. So if this is only video capable, I'm a bit bummed they just didn't shrink down the C100 body 20% or so....that EVF + removal side grip + swivel/tilt screen is such a versatile package.

    the c line is terrible on the 1 arm gimbals. they are hard to balance and become super heavy over time. plus u have to break them down to fit them on.

    • Reply

    • 0
17. hmm, if this baby can also take stills...

    • Reply

    • 0

18. the c line is terrible on the 1 arm gimbals. they are hard to balance and become super heavy over time. plus u have to break them down to fit them on.

    We got pretty quick with setup/breakdown with the C300MKII on a gimbal. Played with the Mark III and it was much faster to setup. Guess it just depends on your build.

    • Reply

    • 0
19. Looking back through the article it seems this is the one that will have the DGO sensor. No internal raw, but 10 bit 422 and clog2/3. That’s works fine for me. Might be the perfect compromise. I resisted the C300mk3 because of the size. This would be seemingly perfect.

    • Reply

    • 0