svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB2aWV3Qm94PScwIDAgNzI4IDQ2MicgeG1sbnM9J2h0dHA6Ly93d3cudzMub3JnLzIwMDAvc3ZnJz48L3N2Zz4= - Is a Canon RF 14-28mm f/2L USM on the way? [CR1]

    Is a Canon RF 14-28mm f/2L USM on the way? [CR1]

    By Updated:147 Comments1 Min Read Canon Lens Rumors

    There have been a few rumors that Canon will do a “holy trinity” of RF mount f/2L zoom lenses, as you know, we already have the RF 28-70mm f/2L USM, which is an amazing piece of glass.

    An unknown source now claims that an RF 14-28mm f/2L USM is on the way sometime in 2020, this goes with a previous rumor of an RF 70-135mm f/2L USM coming as well.

    That would be quite the trifecta of zoom lenses from Canon.

    More to come…

    Go to discussion...

    Share.

    Related Posts

    147 comments

    2. I demand a 70-200 f/2L with dual card slots.

      Dual card slots on the camera is not safe enough. Customers demand dual dual redundancy and backup. With the new RF mount boasting extra data bandwidth, it can send the files straight to the lens card slots. Brilliant idea.
    4. Dual card slots on the camera is not safe enough. Customers demand dual dual redundancy and backup. With the new RF mount boasting extra data bandwidth, it can send the files straight to the lens card slots. Brilliant idea.
      Now that's a great idea but would they be immune to the virus?

      Jack
    9. A trinity line with IS and another trinity line of F2..

      I feel bad for Nikon and Sony shooters.. Neither is even an option for them.
      I feel bad for the companies. It's almost as if Canon were planning an ambush for the last few years. :cry:

      Jack
    12. Yes, but think of the vignetting. Oh, the horror! :eek:
      That is true, but with the new sensors you can push like you’re giving birth without issues :ROFLMAO:
    13. Yes, but think of the vignetting. Oh, the horror! :eek:
      For what I personally do with my gear I have yet to find a single lens where vignette is a problem. It is either corrected very well in camera or it is an effect I desire in the photo. But yes, some will find it to be terrible for their use.
    16. I know there are folks that love themselves some bokeh. I'm not one of them. Ansel Adams and the rest of the f64 school have got to be rolling in their graves. Minimum $9,000 for this "trinity" that doesn't go past 135mm doesn't tempt me. I'd much rather have a big white if I could afford that kind of money.
    17. I know there are folks that love themselves some bokeh. I'm not one of them. Ansel Adams and the rest of the f64 school have got to be rolling in their graves. Minimum $9,000 for this "trinity" that doesn't go past 135mm doesn't tempt me. I'd much rather have a big white if I could afford that kind of money.

      f/2.br0ke
    18. I know there are folks that love themselves some bokeh. I'm not one of them. Ansel Adams and the rest of the f64 school have got to be rolling in their graves. Minimum $9,000 for this "trinity" that doesn't go past 135mm doesn't tempt me. I'd much rather have a big white if I could afford that kind of money.
      I love my single big white, for it's purpose but the 11-24 gives me no regrets.

      Jack
    19. I have the 11-24 f/4 L lens....and it is great fun.

      This new RF lens sounds interesting, but I'm wondering why they aren't going as wide at the older EF lens?

      Would it just be too big or something to do 11-24 at f/2?

      C

    Leave a comment

    Please log in to your forum account to comment