From NL
Over at NL they've been told to expect Canon to answer to demand with the upcoming lens announcements.
24-70 f/2.8L IS I predict is the most wanted lens to Canonites.
Or is it?
[poll id=”7″]
cr
Some of our articles may include affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you.
155 Comments
Out of sheer curiosity: how does a TS-E 24mm II with two EF 2x II extenders compare to the TS-E 90mm as far as image quality goes ?
Me too, though there are so many technical issues that would need to be overcome. I mean, why not add autofocus while we’re at it? :) (And couldn’t it be done with special zone AF selection points, and so on, heh heh.)
A 35mm TS-E seems more realistic to me.
Updates to the TS-E 45mm and the 90mm would be great (being able to rotate the tilt and shift both in relation to each other and to the camera is a great feature).
How old is the 100-400? An update is needed!
How long as Nikon had a 200-400 and Canon hasn’t replied?
IMHO both of these are needed.
I have to say my 100-400 on an xti does exactly what I need it to. IS is great and focus is quick. I like the push/pull although it did take a little getting used to.
I’d like the 24-70 2.8L IS to cover the shorter end. My other lenses are kit, no IS and pretty poor overall.
I think the poll is wrong. I like to shoot with two APS-C bodies. My long lens is the 70-200 2.8 IS L. I have been campaigning for Canon to make a COMPLEMENT that starts at 95degrees. This would be about the equivalent of a 15-70 2.8 L Lens. Does any one agree? The current stable is all designed for full frame.